Mirror, Mirror of the Flow: How Does Regularization Shape Implicit Bias?
Tom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka Burkholz
Abstract
Implicit bias plays an important role in explaining how overparameterized models generalize well. Explicit regularization like weight decay is often employed in addition to prevent overfitting. While both concepts have been studied separately, in practice, they often act in tandem. Understanding their interplay is key to controlling the shape and strength of implicit bias, as it can be modified by explicit regularization. To this end, we incorporate explicit regularization into the mirror flow framework and analyze its lasting effects on the geometry of the training dynamics, covering three distinct effects: positional bias, type of bias, and range shrinking. Our analytical approach encompasses a broad class of problems, including sparse coding, matrix sensing, single-layer attention, and LoRA, for which we demonstrate the utility of our insights. To exploit the lasting effect of regularization and highlight the potential benefit of dynamic weight decay schedules, we propose to switch off weight decay during training, which can improve generalization, as we demonstrate in experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cec2c3c4-57da-42b5-bdf4-ee8df7d7a32eCited by top-tier papers8
- Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror FlowTom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Neural Graduated Assignment for Maximum Common Edge SubgraphsChaolong Ying, Yingqi Ruan, Xuemin Chen, Yaomin Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Hyperbolic Aware Minimization: Implicit Bias for SparsityTom Jacobs, Advait Gadhikar, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Robustness of Mixtures of Experts to Feature NoiseDong Sun, Rahul Nittala, Rebekka BurkholzICML 2026 · 1 citation
- SparseOpt: Addressing Normalization-induced Gradient Skew in Sparse TrainingAdnan Mohammed, Rohan Jain, Tom Jacobs, Ekansh Sharma et al.ICML 2026
Builds on16
- RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search SpaceEkin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc LeNeurIPS 2020 · 4,453 citations
- Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank LearningZhiyuan Li, Yuping Luo, Kaifeng LyuICLR 2021 · 155 citations
- Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of StochasticityScott Pesme, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2021 · 135 citations
- On the Implicit Bias of Initialization Shape: Beyond Infinitesimal Mirror DescentShahar Azulay, Edward Moroshko, Mor Shpigel Nacson, Blake E. Woodworth et al.ICML 2021 · 85 citations
- Initialization and Regularization of Factorized Neural LayersMikhail Khodak, Neil A. Tenenholtz, Lester Mackey, Nicolò FusiICLR 2021 · 74 citations
Related papers
- Mask in the Mirror: Implicit SparsificationTom Jacobs, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2025
- Why Do We Need Weight Decay in Modern Deep Learning?Francesco D'Angelo, Maksym Andriushchenko, Aditya Vardhan Varre, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2024 · 101 citations
- LoRA Training Provably Converges to a Low-Rank Global Minimum Or It Fails Loudly (But it Probably Won't Fail)Junsu Kim, Jaeyeon Kim, Ernest K. RyuICML 2025
- Conflicting Biases at the Edge of Stability: Norm versus Sharpness RegularizationMaria Matveev, Vit Fojtik, Hung-Hsu Chou, Gitta Kutyniok et al.ICML 2026
- Combining Explicit and Implicit Regularization for Efficient Learning in Deep NetworksDan ZhaoNeurIPS 2022 · 9 citations
