Mask in the Mirror: Implicit Sparsification
Tom Jacobs, Rebekka Burkholz
Abstract
Continuous sparsification strategies are among the most effective methods for reducing the inference costs and memory demands of large-scale neural networks. A key factor in their success is the implicit L 1 regularization induced by jointly learning both mask and weight variables, which has been shown experimentally to outperform explicit L 1 regularization. We provide a theoretical explanation for this observation by analyzing the learning dynamics, revealing that early continuous sparsification is governed by an implicit L 2 regularization that gradually transitions to an L 1 penalty over time. Leveraging this insight, we propose a method to dynamically control the strength of this implicit bias. Through an extension of the mirror flow framework, we establish convergence and optimality guarantees in the context of underdetermined linear regression. Our theoretical findings may be of independent interest, as we demonstrate how to enter the rich regime and show that the implicit bias can be controlled via a time-dependent Bregman potential. To validate these insights, we introduce PILoT, a continuous sparsification approach with novel initialization and dynamic regularization, which consistently outperforms baselines in standard experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 516c137f-dd7d-494e-9ed8-d5b402958a52Cited by top-tier papers11
- Differentiable Sparsity via -Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured PenalizationChris Kolb, Laetitia Frost, Bernd Bischl, David RügamerNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror FlowTom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Neural Graduated Assignment for Maximum Common Edge SubgraphsChaolong Ying, Yingqi Ruan, Xuemin Chen, Yaomin Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Hyperbolic Aware Minimization: Implicit Bias for SparsityTom Jacobs, Advait Gadhikar, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- The Graphon Limit Hypothesis: Understanding Neural Network Pruning via Infinite Width AnalysisHoang Pham, The Anh Ta, Tom Jacobs, Rebekka Burkholz et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on37
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
Related papers
- Mirror, Mirror of the Flow: How Does Regularization Shape Implicit Bias?Tom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka BurkholzICML 2025
- Implicit Bias of the Step Size in Linear Diagonal Neural NetworksMor Shpigel Nacson, Kavya Ravichandran, Nathan Srebro, Daniel SoudryICML 2022 · 57 citations
- Implicit Regularization Leads to Benign Overfitting for Sparse Linear RegressionMo Zhou, Rong GeICML 2023 · 4 citations
- Implicit Regularization for Group SparsityJiangyuan Li, Thanh Van Nguyen, Chinmay Hegde, Raymond K. W. WongICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- On the spectral bias of two-layer linear networksAditya Vardhan Varre, Maria-Luiza Vladarean, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
