Combining Explicit and Implicit Regularization for Efficient Learning in Deep Networks
Dan Zhao
Abstract
Works on implicit regularization have studied gradient trajectories during the optimization process to explain why deep networks favor certain kinds of solutions over others. In deep linear networks, it has been shown that gradient descent implicitly regularizes toward low-rank solutions on matrix completion/factorization tasks. Adding depth not only improves performance on these tasks but also acts as an accelerative pre-conditioning that further enhances this bias towards lowrankedness. Inspired by this, we propose an explicit penalty to mirror this implicit bias which only takes effect with certain adaptive gradient optimizers (e.g. Adam). This combination can enable a degenerate single-layer network to achieve lowrank approximations with generalization error comparable to deep linear networks, making depth no longer necessary for learning. The single-layer network also performs competitively or out-performs various approaches for matrix completion over a range of parameter and data regimes despite its simplicity. Together with an optimizer's inductive bias, our findings suggest that explicit regularization can play a role in designing different, desirable forms of regularization and that a more nuanced understanding of this interplay may be necessary. 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d430712f-0394-49c8-8096-613bd3dcd9f7Cited by top-tier papers2
- Pretraining with Random Noise for Fast and Robust Learning without Weight TransportJeonghwan Cheon, Sang Wan Lee, Se-Bum PaikNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Dependency Parsing is More Parameter-Efficient with NormalizationPaolo Gajo, Domenic Rosati, Hassan Sajjad, Alberto Barrón-CedeñoNeurIPS 2025
Builds on7
- On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and BeyondLiyuan Liu, Haoming Jiang, Pengcheng He, Weizhu Chen et al.ICLR 2020 · 2,210 citations
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
- Implicit Gradient RegularizationDavid G. T. Barrett, Benoit DherinICLR 2021 · 235 citations
- On the Implicit Bias of Initialization Shape: Beyond Infinitesimal Mirror DescentShahar Azulay, Edward Moroshko, Mor Shpigel Nacson, Blake E. Woodworth et al.ICML 2021 · 85 citations
- Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror DescentZhiyuan Li, Tianhao Wang, Jason D. Lee, Sanjeev AroraNeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
Related papers
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by NormsNoam Razin, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- Implicit Sparse Regularization: The Impact of Depth and Early StoppingJiangyuan Li, Thanh Van Nguyen, Chinmay Hegde, Ka Wai WongNeurIPS 2021 · 43 citations
- Implicit Regularization with Polynomial Growth in Deep Tensor FactorizationKais Hariz, Hachem Kadri, Stéphane Ayache, Maher Moakher et al.ICML 2022 · 4 citations
- Implicit Bias in Leaky ReLU Networks Trained on High-Dimensional DataSpencer Frei, Gal Vardi, Peter L. Bartlett, Nathan Srebro et al.ICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Implicit Bias and Loss of Plasticity in Matrix Completion: Depth Promotes Low-RanknessBaekrok Shin, Chulhee YunICLR 2026
