It Didn't Sound Good with My Cochlear Implants: Understanding the Challenges of Using Smart Assistants for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Users
Johnna Blair, Saeed Abdullah
Abstract
How do deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) individuals use smart assistants (SAs)? Does the prominent use of voice interfaces in most SAs pose unique challenges for DHH users? In this work, we aim to answer these questions by conducting 4 in-depth interviews, as well as collecting survey data from 73 DHH individuals. Our findings show that individuals, even with profound deafness, can leverage SAs to accomplish complex daily tasks. However, we also identified a number of common challenges DHH individuals face when interacting with SAs (e.g., high pitch used in the default SA voice interfaces can be incompatible with hearing aids, difficulty using mobile SAs in public places with loud background noise). Based on these insights, we provide a set of suggestions for designing SAs that can better accommodate a wide range of hearing abilities. Specifically, SAs should provide more customization options to allow the user to tailor their SA to meet their hearing needs over time. For example, using a pitch-frequency test feature, much like audiograms conducted by audiologists, could allow users to calibrate their SA's voice to fit within their optimal range. We also see a need to provide more clear and actionable error messages conveyed beyond audio notifications, such as more meaningful light notifications. These recommendations and findings provide the first step forward toward a more inclusive SA by addressing accessibility needs unique to this group.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cdb9b1f5-0f0d-4a09-b5df-d0eaaa7cc9feCited by top-tier papers3
- Listening to the Voices: Describing Ethical Caveats of Conversational User Interfaces According to Experts and Frequent UsersThomas Mildner, Orla Cooney, Anna-Maria Meck, Marion Bartl et al.CHI 2024 · 37 citations
- Alexa as an Active Listener: How Backchanneling Can Elicit Self-Disclosure and Promote User ExperienceEugene Cho, Nasim Motalebi, S. Shyam Sundar, Saeed AbdullahCSCW 2022 · 36 citations
- Deaf and Hard of Hearing Access to Intelligent Personal Assistants: Comparison of Voice-Based Options with an LLM-Powered Touch InterfacePaige S. DeVries, Michaela Okosi, Ming Li, Nora Dunphy et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Analyzing Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Users' Behavior, Usage, and Interaction with a Personal Assistant Device that Understands Sign-Language InputAbraham Glasser, Matthew Watkins, Kira Hart, Sooyeon Lee et al.CHI 2022 · 21 citations
- Toward User-Driven Sound Recognizer Personalization with People Who Are d/Deaf or Hard of HearingSteven Goodman, Ping Liu, Dhruv Jain, Emma J. McDonnell et al.UbiComp 2021 · 33 citations
- Characterizing the Impact of Audio Deepfakes in the Presence of Cochlear ImplantMagdalena Pasternak, Kevin Warren, Daniel Olszewski, Susan Nittrouer et al.NDSS 2025
- ProtoSound: A Personalized and Scalable Sound Recognition System for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing UsersDhruv Jain, Khoa Huynh Anh Nguyen, Steven M. Goodman, Rachel Grossman-Kahn et al.CHI 2022 · 45 citations
- Towards More Transactional Voice Assistants: Investigating the Potential for a Multimodal Voice-Activated Indoor Navigation Assistant for Blind and Sighted TravelersAli Abdolrahmani, Maya Howes Gupta, Mei-Lian Vader, Ravi Kuber et al.CHI 2021 · 25 citations
