Characterizing the Impact of Audio Deepfakes in the Presence of Cochlear Implant
Magdalena Pasternak, Kevin Warren, Daniel Olszewski, Susan Nittrouer, Patrick Traynor, Kevin R. B. Butler
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) allow deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals to use audio devices, such as phones or voice assistants. However, the advent of increasingly sophisticated synthetic audio (i.e., deepfakes) potentially threatens these users. Yet, this population's susceptibility to such attacks is unclear. In this paper, we perform the first study of the impact of audio deepfakes on CI populations. We examine the use of CI-simulated audio within deepfake detectors. Based on these results, we conduct a user study with 35 CI users and 87 hearing persons (HPs) to determine differences in how CI users perceive deepfake audio. We show that CI users can, similarly to HPs, identify text-to-speech generated deepfakes. Yet, they perform substantially worse for voice conversion deepfake generation algorithms, achieving only 67% correct audio classification. We also evaluate how detection models trained on a CI-simulated audio compare to CI users and investigate if they can effectively act as proxies for CI users. This work begins an investigation into the intersection between adversarial audio and CI users to identify and mitigate threats against this marginalized group.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6a8d83fd-a31a-472b-98fc-9b058d76dc8bBuilds on5
- XRAI: Better Attributions Through RegionsAndrei Kapishnikov, Tolga Bolukbasi, Fernanda B. Viégas, Michael TerryICCV 2019 · 251 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- SoK: The Good, The Bad, and The Unbalanced: Measuring Structural Limitations of Deepfake Media DatasetsSeth Layton, Tyler Tucker, Daniel Olszewski, Kevin Warren et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 11 citations
- Uncovering Human Traits in Determining Real and Spoofed Audio: Insights from Blind and Sighted IndividualsChaeeun Han, Prasenjit Mitra, Syed Masum BillahCHI 2024 · 10 citations
- Who Are You (I Really Wanna Know)? Detecting Audio DeepFakes Through Vocal Tract ReconstructionLogan Blue, Kevin Warren, Hadi Abdullah, Cassidy Gibson et al.USENIX Security 2022
Related papers
- Blind and Low-Vision Individuals' Detection of Audio DeepfakesFilipo Sharevski, Aziz Zeidieh, Jennifer Vander Loop, Peter JachimCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- "Better Be Computer or I'm Dumb": A Large-Scale Evaluation of Humans as Audio Deepfake DetectorsKevin Warren, Tyler Tucker, Anna Crowder, Daniel Olszewski et al.CCS 2024 · 9 citations
- Joint Audio-Visual Deepfake DetectionYipin Zhou, Ser-Nam LimICCV 2021 · 232 citations
- It Didn't Sound Good with My Cochlear Implants: Understanding the Challenges of Using Smart Assistants for Deaf and Hard of Hearing UsersJohnna Blair, Saeed AbdullahUbiComp 2021 · 24 citations
- SafeEar: Content Privacy-Preserving Audio Deepfake DetectionXinfeng Li, Kai Li, Yifan Zheng, Chen Yan et al.CCS 2024 · 26 citations
