Lune

CHI2026Top-tier venue

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Access to Intelligent Personal Assistants: Comparison of Voice-Based Options with an LLM-Powered Touch Interface

Paige S. DeVries, Michaela Okosi, Ming Li, Nora Dunphy, Gidey Gezae, Dante Conway, Abraham Glasser, Raja S. Kushalnagar, Christian Vogler

2026Year
2Citations

Abstract

We investigate intelligent personal assistants (IPAs) accessibility for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) people who can use their voice in everyday communication. The inability of IPAs to understand diverse accents including deaf speech renders them largely inaccessible to non-signing and speaking DHH individuals. Using an Echo Show, we compared the usability of natural language input via two spoken English methods against that of a large language model (LLM)-assisted touch interface in a mixed-methods study. The two spoken English methods consisted of Alexa’s built-in automatic speech recognition and a Wizard-of-Oz setting with a trained facilitator re-speaking commands. The touch method was navigated through an LLM-powered ‘task prompter,’ which integrated the user’s history and smart environment to suggest contextually-appropriate commands. Quantitative results showed no significant differences across both spoken English conditions vs LLM-assisted touch. Qualitative results showed variability in opinions on the usability of each method. Ultimately, it will be necessary to have robust deaf-accented speech recognized natively by IPAs.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on5

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines