Rosetta Neurons: Mining the Common Units in a Model Zoo
Amil Dravid, Yossi Gandelsman, Alexei A. Efros, Assaf Shocher
Abstract
Do different neural networks, trained for various vision tasks, share some common representations? In this paper, we demonstrate the existence of common features we call "Rosetta Neurons" across a range of models with different architectures, different tasks (generative and discriminative), and different types of supervision (class-supervised, text-supervised, self-supervised). We present an algorithm for mining a dictionary of Rosetta Neurons across several popular vision models: Class Supervised-ResNet50, DINO-ResNet50, DINO-ViT, MAE, CLIP-ResNet50, Big-GAN, StyleGAN-2, StyleGAN-XL. Our findings suggest that certain visual concepts and structures are inherently embedded in the natural world and can be learned by different models regardless of the specific task or architecture, and without the use of semantic labels. We can visualize shared concepts directly due to generative models included in our analysis. The Rosetta Neurons facilitate model-to-model translation enabling various inversion-based manipulations, including cross-class alignments, shifting, zooming, and more, without the need for specialized training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cb8045d8-0dca-4491-aee3-0fb12fe3ddf2Cited by top-tier papers26
- The Quantization Model of Neural ScalingEric J. Michaud, Ziming Liu, Uzay Girit, Max TegmarkNeurIPS 2023 · 179 citations
- Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based DecompositionYossi Gandelsman, Alexei A. Efros, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2024 · 179 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language ModelsMateusz Pach, Shyamgopal Karthik, Quentin Bouniot, Serge J. Belongie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- Vision Transformers Don't Need Trained RegistersNick Jiang, Amil Dravid, Alexei A. Efros, Yossi GandelsmanNeurIPS 2025 · 50 citations
- Same Task, Different Circuits: Disentangling Modality-Specific Mechanisms in VLMsYaniv Nikankin, Dana Arad, Yossi Gandelsman, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2025 · 37 citations
Builds on11
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- GANalyze: Toward Visual Definitions of Cognitive Image PropertiesLore Goetschalckx, Alex Andonian, Aude Oliva, Phillip IsolaICCV 2019 · 345 citations
- StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse DatasetsAxel Sauer, Katja Schwarz, Andreas GeigerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 326 citations
Related papers
- Make it SING: Analyzing Semantic Invariants in ClassifiersHarel Yadid, Meir Yossef Levi, Roy Betser, Guy GilboaCVPR 2026
- Latent Space Translation via Semantic AlignmentValentino Maiorca, Luca Moschella, Antonio Norelli, Marco Fumero et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 59 citations
- A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent RepresentationsPatrick Esser, Robin Rombach, Björn OmmerCVPR 2020
- Generative Hierarchical Features From Synthesizing ImagesYinghao Xu, Yujun Shen, Jiapeng Zhu, Ceyuan Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- Neural Isometries: Taming Transformations for Equivariant MLThomas W. Mitchel, Michael J. Taylor, Vincent SitzmannNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
