Adaptive Methods Are Preferable in High Privacy Settings: An SDE Perspective
Enea Monzio Compagnoni, Alessandro Stanghellini, Rustem Islamov, Aurélien Lucchi, Anastasia Koloskova
Abstract
Differential Privacy (DP) is becoming central to large-scale training as privacy regulations tighten. We revisit how DP noise interacts with adaptivity in optimization through the lens of stochastic differential equations, providing the first SDE-based analysis of private optimizers. Focusing on DP-SGD and DP-SignSGD under per-example clipping, we show a sharp contrast under fixed hyperparameters: DP-SGD converges at a Privacy-Utility Trade-Off of with speed independent of , while DP-SignSGD converges at a speed linear in with a trade-off, dominating in high-privacy or large batch noise regimes. By contrast, under optimal learning rates, both methods achieve comparable theoretical asymptotic performance; however, the optimal learning rate of DP-SGD scales linearly with , while that of DP-SignSGD is essentially -independent. This makes adaptive methods far more practical, as their hyperparameters transfer across privacy levels with little or no re-tuning. Empirical results confirm our theory across training and test metrics, and empirically extend from DP-SignSGD to DP-Adam.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cb1990ce-ba33-440a-92be-e46001490bb4Builds on22
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private LearnersXuechen Li, Florian Tramèr, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2022 · 502 citations
- Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive ClippingGalen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop RamaswamyNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient DescentSamuel L. Smith, Benoit Dherin, David G. T. Barrett, Soham DeICLR 2021 · 235 citations
Related papers
- Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and StrongerZhiqi Bu, Yu-Xiang Wang, Sheng Zha, George KarypisNeurIPS 2023 · 140 citations
- The Role of Adaptive Optimizers for Honest Private Hyperparameter SelectionShubhankar Mohapatra, Sajin Sasy, Xi He, Gautam Kamath et al.AAAI 2022 · 35 citations
- Adaptive Sigmoid Clipping for Balancing the Direction-Magnitude Mismatch Trade-off in Differentially Private LearningFaeze Moradi Kalarde, Ali Bereyhi, Ben Liang, Min DongNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- TAN Without a Burn: Scaling Laws of DP-SGDTom Sander, Pierre Stock, Alexandre SablayrollesICML 2023 · 58 citations
- Eliminating Solution Bias in Differentially Private OptimizationDONGRUN LI, YUN ZENG, Zibo Wei, Jiacheng Wei et al.ICML 2026
