Adaptive Sigmoid Clipping for Balancing the Direction-Magnitude Mismatch Trade-off in Differentially Private Learning
Faeze Moradi Kalarde, Ali Bereyhi, Ben Liang, Min Dong
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) limits the impact of individual training data samples by bounding their gradient norms through clipping. Conventional clipping operations assign unequal scaling factors to sample gradients with different norms, leading to a direction mismatch between the true batch gradient and the aggregation of the clipped gradients. Applying a smaller but identical scaling factor to all sample gradients alleviates this direction mismatch; however, it intensifies the magnitude mismatch by excessively reducing the aggregation norm. This work proposes a novel clipping method, termed adaptive sigmoid (AdaSig), which uses a sigmoid function with an adjustable saturation slope to clip the sample gradients. The slope is adaptively adjusted during the training process to balance the trade-off between direction mismatch and magnitude mismatch, as the statistics of sample gradients evolve over the training iterations. Despite AdaSig's adaptive nature, our convergence analysis demonstrates that differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) with AdaSig clipping retains the best-known convergence rate under non-convex loss functions. Evaluating AdaSig on sentence and image classification tasks across different datasets shows that it consistently improves learning performance compared with established clipping methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8163b240-5004-4a73-bf84-7a4e6687a062Builds on16
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private LearnersXuechen Li, Florian Tramèr, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2022 · 502 citations
- Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive ClippingGalen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop RamaswamyNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
Related papers
- Differentially Private Learning with Per-Sample Adaptive ClippingTianyu Xia, Shuheng Shen, Su Yao, Xinyi Fu et al.AAAI 2023 · 36 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- SlaClip: Gradient Norm Slacks can be Indicator for Adaptive Clipping in DP-SGDShuyan Zou, Shaowei Wang, Zhanxing Zhu, Jin Li et al.ICML 2026
- GeoClip: Geometry-Aware Clipping for Differentially Private SGDAtefeh Gilani, Naima Tasnim, Lalitha Sankar, Oliver KosutNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback ApproachXinwei Zhang, Zhiqi Bu, Steven Wu, Mingyi HongICLR 2024 · 15 citations
