Responsibility in Extensive Form Games
Qi Shi
Abstract
Two different forms of responsibility, counterfactual and seeing-to-it, have been extensively discussed in the philosophy and AI in the context of a single agent or multiple agents acting simultaneously. Although the generalisation of counterfactual responsibility to a setting where multiple agents act in some order is relatively straightforward, the same cannot be said about seeing-to-it responsibility. Two versions of seeing-to-it modality applicable to such settings have been proposed in the literature. Neither of them perfectly captures the intuition of responsibility. This paper proposes a definition of seeing-to-it responsibility for such settings that amalgamate the two modalities. This paper shows that the newly proposed notion of responsibility and counterfactual responsibility are not definable through each other and studies the responsibility gap for these two forms of responsibility. It shows that although these two forms of responsibility are not enough to ascribe responsibility in each possible situation, this gap does not exist if higherorder responsibility is taken into account.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c9dc1a76-8aa4-473e-8bb7-c8b1b7ad7725Cited by top-tier papers3
- Causal, Strategic, and Combined Responsibility Attribution in Situation Calculus Concurrent Game StructuresMohammad Hossein Karimian, Shakil M. Khan, Yves LespéranceAAAI 2026
- Higher-Order ResponsibilityJunli Jiang, Pavel NaumovAAAI 2026
- A Graph-Theoretical Perspective on Law Design for Multiagent SystemsQi Shi, Pavel NaumovAAAI 2026
Related papers
- Moral Responsibility for AI SystemsSander BeckersNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-MakingGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Meeyoung ChaCHI 2021 · 71 citations
- Responsibility Attribution in Human Interactions with Everyday AI SystemsJoe Brailsford, Frank Vetere, Eduardo VellosoCHI 2025 · 10 citations
- Formalising Human-in-the-Loop: Computational Reductions, Failure Modes, and Legal-Moral ResponsibilityMaurice Chiodo, Dennis Müller, Paul Siewert, Jean-Luc Wetherall et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Who Should Act? Distancing and Vulnerability in Technology Practitioners' Accounts of Ethical ResponsibilityKristina Popova, Clàudia Figueras, Kristina Höök, Airi LampinenCSCW 2024 · 22 citations
