Moral Responsibility for AI Systems
Sander Beckers
Abstract
As more and more decisions that have a significant ethical dimension are being outsourced to AI systems, it is important to have a definition of moral responsibility that can be applied to AI systems. Moral responsibility for an outcome of an agent who performs some action is commonly taken to involve both a causal condition and an epistemic condition: the action should cause the outcome, and the agent should have been aware -- in some form or other -- of the possible moral consequences of their action. This paper presents a formal definition of both conditions within the framework of causal models. I compare my approach to the existing approaches of Braham and van Hees (BvH) and of Halpern and Kleiman-Weiner (HK). I then generalize my definition into a degree of responsibility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9036d7a4-60d8-4239-b579-cd16293358d0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-MakingGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Meeyoung ChaCHI 2021 · 71 citations
- The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of OneAikaterina Manoli, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Jacy Reese AnthisCSCW 2025 · 10 citations
- Causal, Strategic, and Combined Responsibility Attribution in Situation Calculus Concurrent Game StructuresMohammad Hossein Karimian, Shakil M. Khan, Yves LespéranceAAAI 2026
- Guilty Artificial Minds: Folk Attributions of Mens Rea and Culpability to Artificially Intelligent AgentsMichael T. Stuart, Markus KneerCSCW 2021 · 48 citations
- Responsibility in Extensive Form GamesQi ShiAAAI 2024 · 5 citations
