Higher-Order Responsibility
Junli Jiang, Pavel Naumov
Abstract
In ethics, individual responsibility is often defined through Frankfurt's principle of alternative possibilities. This definition is not adequate in a group decision-making setting because it often results in the lack of a responsible party or "responsibility gap". One of the existing approaches to address this problem is to consider group responsibility. Another, recently proposed, approach is "higher-order" responsibility. The paper considers the problem of determining whether higher-order responsibility up to a given degree is sufficient to close the responsibility gap and analyses the computational complexity of this problem.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on2
Related papers
- Moral Responsibility for AI SystemsSander BeckersNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Moral Uncertainty and the Problem of FanaticismJazon Szabo, Natalia Criado, Jose Such, Sanjay ModgilAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- The Complexity of Proportionality Degree in Committee ElectionsLukasz Janeczko, Piotr FaliszewskiAAAI 2022 · 4 citations
- Who Should Act? Distancing and Vulnerability in Technology Practitioners' Accounts of Ethical ResponsibilityKristina Popova, Clàudia Figueras, Kristina Höök, Airi LampinenCSCW 2024 · 22 citations
- Are Two Heads Better Than One in AI-Assisted Decision Making? Comparing the Behavior and Performance of Groups and Individuals in Human-AI Collaborative Recidivism Risk AssessmentChun-Wei Chiang, Zhuoran Lu, Zhuoyan Li, Ming YinCHI 2023 · 56 citations
