Controllable LLM Reasoning via Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steering
Yi Fang, Wenjie Wang, Mingfeng Xue, Boyi Deng, Fengli Xu, Dayiheng Liu, Fuli Feng
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit human-like cognitive reasoning strategies (e.g. backtracking, cross-verification) during reasoning process, which improves their performance on complex tasks. Currently, reasoning strategies are autonomously selected by LRMs themselves. However, such autonomous selection often produces inefficient or even erroneous reasoning paths. To make reasoning more reliable and flexible, it is important to develop methods for controlling reasoning strategies. Existing methods struggle to control fine-grained reasoning strategies due to conceptual entanglement in LRMs'hidden states. To address this, we leverage Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to decompose strategy-entangled hidden states into a disentangled feature space. To identify the few strategy-specific features from the vast pool of SAE features, we propose SAE-Steering, an efficient two-stage feature identification pipeline. SAE-Steering first recalls features that amplify the logits of strategy-specific keywords, filtering out over 99% of features, and then ranks the remaining features by their control effectiveness. Using the identified strategy-specific features as control vectors, SAE-Steering outperforms existing methods by over 15% in control effectiveness. Furthermore, controlling reasoning strategies can redirect LRMs from erroneous paths to correct ones, achieving a 7% absolute accuracy improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c7f4a831-76b4-4a3c-b874-af40eaf86535Cited by top-tier papers3
- Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?George Ma, Zhongyuan Liang, Irene Y. Chen, Somayeh SojoudiICML 2026 · 9 citations
- SASFT: Sparse Autoencoder-guided Supervised Finetuning to Mitigate Unexpected Code-Switching in LLMsBoyi Deng, Yu Wan, Baosong Yang, Fei Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- The Tell-Tale Norm: Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language ModelsJinyang Zhang, Hongxin Ding, Yue Fang, Weibin Liao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on15
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 419 citations
- SELF-DISCOVER: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning StructuresPei Zhou, Jay Pujara, Xiang Ren, Xinyun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 151 citations
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
Related papers
- Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process InterpretationXuan Yang, Jiayu Liu, Yuhang Lai, Hao Xu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Feature Extraction and Steering for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsZihao Li, Xu Wang, Yuzhe Yang, Ziyu Yao et al.EMNLP 2025 · 14 citations
- Fantastic Reasoning Behaviors and Where to Find Them: Unsupervised Discovery of the Reasoning ProcessZhenyu Zhang, Shujian Zhang, John Lambert, Wenxuan Zhou et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation SpacesLukas Helff, Ruben Härle, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target AtomsMengru Wang, Ziwen Xu, Shengyu Mao, Shumin Deng et al.ACL 2025 · 19 citations
