The Tell-Tale Norm: Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Models
Jinyang Zhang, Hongxin Ding, Yue Fang, Weibin Liao, Muyang Ye, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang
Abstract
Recent work has sought to understand Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning, yet a principled, model-intrinsic signal that captures its layer-wise reasoning dynamics remains underexplored. We bridge this gap by demonstrating that the norm of hidden states serves as an endogenous signal of the model's reasoning intensity. Using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) as a diagnostic probe, we observe that LLMs' internal reasoning is marked by a sharp increase in reasoning feature activations concentrated in late layers. Motivated by this pattern, we establish a formal link between reasoning intensity and the model's latent geometry and theoretically prove that the norm of hidden states bounds the activation strength of SAE reasoning features. Empirical correlation analysis and causal interventions further prove norm as a faithful indicator, where heightened norms consistently correspond to critical reasoning steps. We then introduce three test-time scaling techniques guided by norms: Adaptive Layer-wise Reasoning Recursion, (ii) Endogenous Reasoning State Steering, and (iii) -guided Response Selection, which requires no additional training or data and is compatible with advanced inference engines. Experiments across model architectures and benchmarks show that -norm-based techniques significantly improve reasoning performance, offering a principled yet simple lens to perceive and control LLM latent reasoning dynamics. Our codes are anonymously available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/The-Tell-Tale-Norm-4E40
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dbb5510b-d232-415a-9fce-419b65143df6Builds on8
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
- Deep Think with ConfidenceYichao Fu, Xuewei Wang, Hao Zhang, Yuandong Tian et al.ICLR 2026 · 171 citations
- ProMed: Shapley Information Gain Guided Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Medical LLMsHongxin Ding, Baixiang Huang, Yue Fang, Weibin Liao et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
- How Does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse AutoencodingXi Chen, Aske Plaat, Niki van SteinAAAI 2026 · 9 citations
Related papers
- ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation SpacesLukas Helff, Ruben Härle, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Fantastic Reasoning Behaviors and Where to Find Them: Unsupervised Discovery of the Reasoning ProcessZhenyu Zhang, Shujian Zhang, John Lambert, Wenxuan Zhou et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process InterpretationXuan Yang, Jiayu Liu, Yuhang Lai, Hao Xu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse AutoencodersAndrey V. Galichin, Alexey Dontsov, Polina Druzhinina, Anton Razzhigaev et al.AAAI 2026 · 31 citations
- Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to InterventionShuochen Chang, Tong Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qianli Ma et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
