Informational Friction as a Lens for Studying Algorithmic Aspects of Privacy
Patrick Skeba, Eric P. S. Baumer
Abstract
This paper addresses challenges in conceptualizing privacy posed by algorithmic systems that can infer sensitive information from seemingly innocuous data. This type of privacy is of imminent concern due to the rapid adoption of machine learning and artificial intelligence systems in virtually every industry. In this paper, we suggest informational friction, a concept from Floridi's ethics of information, as a valuable conceptual lens for studying algorithmic aspects of privacy. Informational friction describes the amount of work required for one agent to access or alter the information of another. By focusing on amount of work, rather than the type of information or manner in which it is collected, informational friction can help to explain why automated analyses should raise privacy concerns independently of, and in addition to, those associated with data collection. As a demonstration, this paper analyze law enforcement use of facial recognition, andFacebook's targeted advertising model using informational friction and demonstrate risks inherent to these systems which are not completely identified in another popular framework, Nissenbaum's Contextual Integrity.The paper concludes with a discussion of broader implications, both for privacy research and for privacy regulation.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get c698cb20-1292-4140-b448-9e05ddbc7671Cited by top-tier papers4
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIJordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed R. Brubaker et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- A Roadmap for Applying the Contextual Integrity Framework in Qualitative Privacy ResearchPriya C. Kumar, Michael Zimmer, Jessica VitakCSCW 2024 · 22 citations
- Communicating the Privacy-Utility Trade-off: Supporting Informed Data Donation with Privacy Decision Interfaces for Differential PrivacyDaniel Franzen, Claudia Müller-Birn, Odette WegwarthCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- Surrendering to Powerlesness: Governing Personal Data Flows in Generative AIAlejandra Gómez Ortega, Hosana Morales Ornelas, Ugur GençCHI 2025 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Unveiling and Quantifying Facebook Exploitation of Sensitive Personal Data for Advertising PurposesJosé González Cabañas, Ángel Cuevas, Rubén CuevasUSENIX Security 2018 · 54 citations
- What's Privacy Good for? Measuring Privacy as a Shield from Harms due to AI Inference of Personal DataSri Harsha Gajavalli, Junichi Koizumi, Rakibul HasanCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- The Pervasive Blind Spot: Benchmarking VLM Inference Risks on Everyday Personal VideosShuning Zhang, Zhaoxin Li, Changxi Wen, Ying Ma et al.UbiComp 2026
- MultiPriv: Benchmarking Individual-Level Privacy Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsXiongtao Sun, HUI LI, Jiaming Zhang, Yujie Yang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- "I Don't Know If We're Doing Good. I Don't Know If We're Doing Bad": Investigating How Practitioners Scope, Motivate, and Conduct Privacy Work When Developing AI ProductsHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Lan Gao, Stephanie S. Yang, Jodi Forlizzi et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 14 citations
