Communicating the Privacy-Utility Trade-off: Supporting Informed Data Donation with Privacy Decision Interfaces for Differential Privacy
Daniel Franzen, Claudia Müller-Birn, Odette Wegwarth
Abstract
Data collections, such as those from citizen science projects, can provide valuable scientific insights or help the public to make decisions based on real demand. At the same time, the collected data might cause privacy risks for their volunteers, for example, by revealing sensitive information. Similar but less apparent trade-offs exist for data collected while using social media or other internet-based services. One approach to addressing these privacy risks might be to anonymize the data, for example, by using Differential Privacy (DP). DP allows for tuning and, consequently, communicating the trade-off between the data contributors' privacy and the resulting data utility for insights. However, there is little research that explores how to communicate the existing trade-off to users. % We contribute to closing this research gap by designing interactive elements and visualizations that specifically support people's understanding of this privacy-utility trade-off. We evaluated our user interfaces in a user study (N=378). Our results show that a combination of graphical risk visualization and interactive risk exploration best supports the informed decision, the privacy decision is consistent with users' privacy concerns. Additionally, we found that personal attributes, such as numeracy, and the need for cognition, significantly influence the decision behavior and the privacy usability of privacy decision interfaces. In our recommendations, we encourage data collectors, such as citizen science project coordinators, to communicate existing privacy risks to their volunteers since such communication does not impact donation rates. %Understanding such privacy risks can also be part of typical training efforts in citizen science projects. %DP allows volunteers to balance their privacy concerns with their wish to contribute to the project. From a design perspective, we emphasize the complexity of the decision situation and the resulting need to design with usability for all population groups in mind. % We hope that our study will inspire further research from the human-computer interaction community that will unlock the full potential of DP for a broad audience and ultimately contribute to a societal understanding of acceptable privacy losses in specific data contexts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 967c3ec8-6b8c-4406-9c1d-e40dc6257345Cited by top-tier papers3
- Leveraging Familiarity with Television to Enrich Older Adults' Engagement and Wellbeing: A Feasibility Study Using Video ProbesShyama Sastha Krishnamoorthy Srinivasan, Mohan Kumar, Pushpendra SinghCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- When Feasibility of Fairness Audits Relies on Willingness to Share Data: Examining User Acceptance of Multi-Party Computation Protocols for Fairness MonitoringChangyang He, Parnian Jahangirirad, Lin Kyi, Asia J. BiegaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Supporting Family Discussions About Digital Privacy Through Perspective-Taking: An Empirical InvestigationZikai Wen, Lanjing Liu, Yaxing YaoS&P 2025
Builds on12
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism PerspectiveColin M. Gray, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth et al.CHI 2021 · 175 citations
- A Design Space for Privacy Choices: Towards Meaningful Privacy Control in the Internet of ThingsYuanyuan Feng, Yaxing Yao, Norman M. SadehCHI 2021 · 114 citations
- "Okay, whatever": An Evaluation of Cookie Consent InterfacesHana Habib, Megan Li, Ellie Young, Lorrie Faith CranorCHI 2022 · 103 citations
- Toggles, Dollar Signs, and Triangles: How to (In)Effectively Convey Privacy Choices with Icons and Link TextsHana Habib, Yixin Zou, Yaxing Yao, Alessandro Acquisti et al.CHI 2021 · 73 citations
Related papers
- Am I Private and If So, how Many?: Communicating Privacy Guarantees of Differential Privacy with Risk Communication FormatsDaniel Franzen, Saskia Nuñez von Voigt, Peter Sörries, Florian Tschorsch et al.CCS 2022 · 13 citations
- What Are the Chances? Explaining the Epsilon Parameter in Differential PrivacyPriyanka Nanayakkara, Mary Anne Smart, Rachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Casual Users and Rational Choices within Differential PrivacyNarges Ashena, Oana Inel, Badrie L. Persaud, Abraham BernsteinS&P 2024 · 3 citations
- Don't Look at the Data! How Differential Privacy Reconfigures the Practices of Data ScienceJayshree Sarathy, Sophia Song, Audrey Haque, Tania Schlatter et al.CHI 2023 · 24 citations
- "Having Confidence in My Confidence Intervals": How Data Users Engage with Privacy-Protected Wikipedia DataHarold Triedman, Jayshree Sarathy, Priyanka Nanayakkara, Rachel Cummings et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
