"Having Confidence in My Confidence Intervals": How Data Users Engage with Privacy-Protected Wikipedia Data
Harold Triedman, Jayshree Sarathy, Priyanka Nanayakkara, Rachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk, Sean Kross, Elissa M. Redmiles
Abstract
In response to calls for open data and growing privacy threats, organizations are increasingly adopting privacy-preserving techniques such as differential privacy (DP) that add noise when generating published datasets. These techniques are designed to protect privacy of data subjects while enabling useful analyses, but their reception by data users is underexplored. We developed documentation that presents the noise characteristics of two Wikipedia pageview datasets: one using rounding (heuristic privacy) and another using DP (formal privacy). After incorporating expert feedback (n = 5), we used these documents to conduct a task-based contextual inquiry (n = 15) exploring how data users-largely unfamiliar with these methods-perceive, interact with, and interpret privacy-preserving noise during data analysis.
Participants readily used simple uncertainty metrics from the documentation, but struggled when asked to compute confidence intervals across multiple noisy estimates. They were better able to devise simulation-based approaches for computing uncertainty with DP data compared to rounded data. Surprisingly, several participants incorrectly believed DP's stronger utility implied weaker privacy protections. Based on our findings, we offer design recommendations for documentation and tools to better support data users working with privacy-noised data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- Towards Effective Differential Privacy Communication for Users' Data Sharing Decision and ComprehensionAiping Xiong, Tianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2020 · 72 citations
- Understanding Challenges for Developers to Create Accurate Privacy Nutrition LabelsTianshi Li, Kayla Reiman, Yuvraj Agarwal, Lorrie Faith Cranor et al.CHI 2022 · 56 citations
- "I need a better description": An Investigation Into User Expectations For Differential PrivacyRachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk, Elissa M. RedmilesCCS 2021 · 45 citations
- Exploring Design and Governance Challenges in the Development of Privacy-Preserving ComputationNitin Agrawal, Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, Kim Laine et al.CHI 2021 · 37 citations
- Understanding Risks of Privacy Theater with Differential PrivacyMary Anne Smart, Dhruv Sood, Kristen VaccaroCSCW 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Investigating Visual Analysis of Differentially Private DataDan Zhang, Ali Sarvghad, Gerome MiklauIEEE VIS 2020 · 19 citations
- Don't Look at the Data! How Differential Privacy Reconfigures the Practices of Data ScienceJayshree Sarathy, Sophia Song, Audrey Haque, Tania Schlatter et al.CHI 2023 · 24 citations
- "I inherently just trust that it works": Investigating Mental Models of Open-Source Libraries for Differential PrivacyPatrick Song, Jayshree Sarathy, Michael Shoemate, Salil P. VadhanCSCW 2024 · 1 citation
- Communicating the Privacy-Utility Trade-off: Supporting Informed Data Donation with Privacy Decision Interfaces for Differential PrivacyDaniel Franzen, Claudia Müller-Birn, Odette WegwarthCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- What Are the Chances? Explaining the Epsilon Parameter in Differential PrivacyPriyanka Nanayakkara, Mary Anne Smart, Rachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk et al.USENIX Security 2023
