A Roadmap for Applying the Contextual Integrity Framework in Qualitative Privacy Research
Priya C. Kumar, Michael Zimmer, Jessica Vitak
Abstract
Privacy is an important topic in HCI and social computing research, and the theory of contextual integrity (CI) is increasingly used to understand how sociotechnical systems-and the new kinds of information flows they introduce-can violate privacy. In empirical research, CI can serve as a conceptual framework for explaining the contextual nature of privacy as well as an analytical framework for evaluating privacy attitudes and behaviors. Analytical applications of CI in HCI primarily employ quantitative methods to identify appropriate information flows but rarely engage with the full CI framework to evaluate such flows. In this paper, we present a roadmap to guide HCI and social computing researchers on how to apply the full CI framework to qualitative projects. To help researchers envision what such an analysis can look like, each step includes an example analysis using interview data from projects on privacy and fitness tracking. We conclude by discussing how harnessing the full CI framework can address critiques of CI and identify opportunities for further theory development.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0f1df3cc-93b3-4687-8401-8b187d181aafCited by top-tier papers4
- Surrendering to Powerlesness: Governing Personal Data Flows in Generative AIAlejandra Gómez Ortega, Hosana Morales Ornelas, Ugur GençCHI 2025 · 9 citations
- Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows through Decentralized Social MediaSohyeon Hwang, Priyanka Nanayakkara, Yan ShvartzshnaiderCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Privacy Cards for Surfacing Mental Models and Exploring Privacy Concerns: A Case Study of Voice-First Ambient Interfaces with Older AdultsAndrea Cuadra, Samar Sabie, Yan Shvartzshnaider, Deborah EstrinCHI 2026
- Iterative Netnography and Occurrence for Rapid Research: A Case Study of TikTokNina Lutz, Kiera Hannuksela, Ethan Hynes, Celestine Le et al.CSCW 2026
Builds on10
- Tangible Privacy: Towards User-Centric Sensor Designs for Bystander PrivacyImtiaz Ahmad, Rosta Farzan, Apu Kapadia, Adam J. LeeCSCW 2020 · 121 citations
- The Politics of Privacy Theories: Moving from Norms to VulnerabilitiesNora McDonald, Andrea ForteCHI 2020 · 119 citations
- Privacy Norms for Smart Home Personal AssistantsNoura Abdi, Xiao Zhan, Kopo M. Ramokapane, Jose M. SuchCHI 2021 · 107 citations
- Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of Privacy Regulation: Parents' IoT Toy Privacy Norms Versus COPPANoah J. Apthorpe, Sarah Varghese, Nick FeamsterUSENIX Security 2019 · 69 citations
- Apps Against the Spread: Privacy Implications and User Acceptance of COVID-19-Related Smartphone Apps on Three ContinentsChristine Utz, Steffen Becker, Theodor Schnitzler, Florian M. Farke et al.CHI 2021 · 59 citations
Related papers
- I Feel Like All of This Is Already Happening Anyways?: Context Import and Young Adults' Perspectives on Researcher Access to TikTok DataAnna Lenhart, Katie ShiltonCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Proctoring: Privacy Invasion or Study Alleviation?: Discovering Acceptability Using Contextual IntegrityArnout Terpstra, Alwin de Rooij, Alexander P. SchoutenCHI 2023 · 26 citations
- Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: What's Acceptable (and What's Not) in Neighborhood Video SurveillanceJanusz Swierczynski, Brittany I. Davidson, Joanna Syrda, Adam JoinsonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Towards Better Reflexive Thematic Analysis in HCI: A Scoping Review of Practice at CHIJacob M. Rigby, Ioanna IacovidesCHI 2026 · 6 citations
- From Discovery to Decisions: Archetypal Journeys of Mobile App Users and Their Implications on PrivacyH. T. M. A. Riyadh, Divyanshu Bhardwaj, Maria Victoria Hellenthal, Alexander Hart et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
