Counterfactual Prediction for Outcome-Oriented Treatments
Hao Zou, Bo Li, Jiangang Han, Shuiping Chen, Xuetao Ding, Peng Cui
Abstract
Large amounts of efforts have been devoted into learning counterfactual treatment outcome under various settings, including binary/continuous/multiple treatments. Most of these literature aims to minimize the estimation error of counterfactual outcome for the whole treatment space. However, in most scenarios when the counterfactual prediction model is utilized to assist decision-making, people are only concerned with the small fraction of treatments that can potentially induce superior outcome (i.e. outcomeoriented treatments). This gap of objective is even more severe when the number of possible treatments is large, for example under the continuous treatment setting. To overcome it, we establish a new objective of optimizing counterfactual prediction on outcome-oriented treatments, propose a novel Outcome-Oriented Sample Re-weighting (OOSR) method to make the predictive model concentrate more on outcome-oriented treatments, and theoretically analyze that our method can improve treatment selection towards the optimal one. Extensive experimental results on both synthetic datasets and semi-synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c654699b-7dee-4938-8760-dbda9c490ad3Cited by top-tier papers4
- Causal LLM Routing: End-to-End Regret Minimization from Observational DataAsterios Tsiourvas, Wei Sun, Georgia PerakisNeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
- Reliable Off-Policy Learning for Dosage CombinationsJonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Valentyn Melnychuk, Stefan FeuerriegelNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Treatment Effect Estimation with Adjustment Feature SelectionHaotian Wang, Kun Kuang, Haoang Chi, Longqi Yang et al.KDD 2023 · 8 citations
- Treatment Effect Estimation for Optimal Decision-MakingDennis Frauen, Valentyn Melnychuk, Jonas Schweisthal, Mihaela van der Schaar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on8
- Estimating counterfactual treatment outcomes over time through adversarially balanced representationsIoana Bica, Ahmed M. Alaa, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2020 · 224 citations
- Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual RegressionNegar Hassanpour, Russell GreinerICLR 2020 · 176 citations
- Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response CurvesPatrick Schwab, Lorenz Linhardt, Stefan Bauer, Joachim M. Buhmann et al.AAAI 2020 · 159 citations
- Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial NetworksIoana Bica, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2020 · 137 citations
- Counterfactual Prediction for Bundle TreatmentHao Zou, Peng Cui, Bo Li, Zheyan Shen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 53 citations
Related papers
- Contrastive Balancing Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Dose-Response Curves EstimationMinqin Zhu, Anpeng Wu, Haoxuan Li, Ruoxuan Xiong et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Generalization Bounds for Estimating Causal Effects of Continuous TreatmentsXin Wang, Shengfei Lyu, Xingyu Wu, Tianhao Wu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 38 citations
- Reducing Confounding Bias without Data Splitting for Causal Inference via Optimal TransportYuguang Yan, Zongyu Li, Haolin Yang, Zeqin Yang et al.ICML 2025
- Adversarially Balanced Representation for Continuous Treatment Effect EstimationAmirreza Kazemi, Martin EsterAAAI 2024 · 8 citations
- Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over TimeToon Vanderschueren, Alicia Curth, Wouter Verbeke, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2023 · 18 citations
