Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time
Toon Vanderschueren, Alicia Curth, Wouter Verbeke, Mihaela van der Schaar
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) holds great potential for accurately forecasting treatment outcomes over time, which could ultimately enable the adoption of more individualized treatment strategies in many practical applications. However, a significant challenge that has been largely overlooked by the ML literature on this topic is the presence of informative sampling in observational data. When instances are observed irregularly over time, sampling times are typically not random, but rather informative -- depending on the instance's characteristics, past outcomes, and administered treatments. In this work, we formalize informative sampling as a covariate shift problem and show that it can prohibit accurate estimation of treatment outcomes if not properly accounted for. To overcome this challenge, we present a general framework for learning treatment outcomes in the presence of informative sampling using inverse intensity-weighting, and propose a novel method, TESAR-CDE, that instantiates this framework using Neural CDEs. Using a simulation environment based on a clinical use case, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in learning under informative sampling.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 43157c20-cee6-4a65-9c18-98908eebf1dcCited by top-tier papers7
- Bayesian Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Treatment Effect EstimationKonstantin Hess, Valentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen, Stefan FeuerriegelICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- IGC-Net for conditional average potential outcome estimation over timeKonstantin Hess, Dennis Frauen, Valentyn Melnychuk, Stefan FeuerriegelICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Partially Stochastic Infinitely Deep Bayesian Neural NetworksSergio Calvo-Ordoñez, Matthieu Meunier, Francesco Piatti, Yuantao ShiICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying TreatmentsShenghao Wu, Wenbin Zhou, Minshuo Chen, Shixiang ZhuKDD 2024 · 2 citations
- Stabilized Neural Prediction of Potential Outcomes in Continuous TimeKonstantin Hess, Stefan FeuerriegelICLR 2025
Builds on8
- Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Irregular Time SeriesPatrick Kidger, James Morrill, James Foster, Terry J. LyonsNeurIPS 2020 · 850 citations
- Estimating counterfactual treatment outcomes over time through adversarially balanced representationsIoana Bica, Ahmed M. Alaa, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2020 · 224 citations
- Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual RegressionNegar Hassanpour, Russell GreinerICLR 2020 · 176 citations
- Causal Transformer for Estimating Counterfactual OutcomesValentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen, Stefan FeuerriegelICML 2022 · 146 citations
- On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationAlicia Curth, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 114 citations
Related papers
- Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential EquationsNabeel Seedat, Fergus Imrie, Alexis Bellot, Zhaozhi Qian et al.ICML 2022 · 68 citations
- SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event DataAlicia Curth, Changhee Lee, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 41 citations
- A Diffusion-Based Method for Learning the Multi-Outcome Distribution of Medical TreatmentsYuchen Ma, Jonas Schweisthal, Hengrui Zhang, Stefan FeuerriegelKDD 2025
- LLM-Driven Treatment Effect Estimation Under Inference Time Text ConfoundingYuchen Ma, Dennis Frauen, Jonas Schweisthal, Stefan FeuerriegelNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Counterfactual Prediction for Outcome-Oriented TreatmentsHao Zou, Bo Li, Jiangang Han, Shuiping Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 8 citations
