Is Your Learned Query Optimizer Behaving As You Expect? A Machine Learning Perspective
Claude Lehmann, Pavel Sulimov, Kurt Stockinger
Abstract
The current boom of learned query optimizers (LQO) can be explained not only by the general continuous improvement of deep learning (DL) methods but also by the straightforward formulation of a query optimization problem (QOP) as a machine learning (ML) one. The idea is often to replace dynamic programming approaches, widespread for solving QOP, with more powerful methods such as reinforcement learning. However, such a rapid "game change" in the field of QOP could not pass without consequences - other parts of the ML pipeline, except for predictive model development, have large improvement potential. For instance, different LQOs introduce their own restrictions on training data generation from queries, use an arbitrary train/validation approach, and evaluate on a voluntary split of benchmark queries.
In this paper, we attempt to standardize the ML pipeline for evaluating LQOs by introducing a new end-to-end benchmarking framework. Additionally, we guide the reader through each data science stage in the ML pipeline and provide novel insights from the machine learning perspective, considering the specifics of QOP. Finally, we perform a rigorous evaluation of existing LQOs, showing that PostgreSQL outperforms these LQOs in almost all experiments depending on the train/test splits.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c4ed27c5-21ea-4a27-aa59-78ee74fcb419Cited by top-tier papers11
- The Holon Approach for Simultaneously Tuning Multiple Components in a Self-Driving Database Management System with Machine Learning via Synthesized Proto-ActionsWilliam Zhang, Wan Shen Lim, Matthew Butrovich, Andrew PavloVLDB 2024 · 13 citations
- How Good are Learned Cost Models, Really? Insights from Query Optimization TasksRoman Heinrich, Manisha Luthra, Johannes Wehrstein, Harald Kornmayer et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 13 citations
- Debunking the Myth of Join Ordering: Toward Robust SQL AnalyticsJunyi Zhao, Kai Su, Yifei Yang, Xiangyao Yu et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 13 citations
- This is Going to Sound Crazy, But What If We Used Large Language Models to Boost Automatic Database Tuning Algorithms By Leveraging Prior History? We Will Find Better Configurations More Quickly Than Retraining From Scratch!William Zhang, Wan Shen Lim, Andrew PavloSIGMOD 2026 · 7 citations
- T3: Accurate and Fast Performance Prediction for Relational Database Systems With Compiled Decision TreesMaximilian Rieger, Thomas NeumannSIGMOD 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on11
- Bao: Making Learned Query Optimization PracticalRyan Marcus, Parimarjan Negi, Hongzi Mao, Nesime Tatbul et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 242 citations
- Cardinality Estimation in DBMS: A Comprehensive Benchmark EvaluationYuxing Han, Ziniu Wu, Peizhi Wu, Rong Zhu et al.VLDB 2022 · 169 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Tree-LSTM for Join Order SelectionXiang Yu, Guoliang Li, Chengliang Chai, Nan TangICDE 2020 · 168 citations
- DeepDB: Learn from Data, not from Queries!Benjamin Hilprecht, Andreas Schmidt, Moritz Kulessa, Alejandro Molina et al.VLDB 2020 · 154 citations
- NeuroCard: One Cardinality Estimator for All TablesZongheng Yang, Amog Kamsetty, Sifei Luan, Eric Liang et al.VLDB 2021 · 138 citations
Related papers
- LEON: A New Framework for ML-Aided Query OptimizationXu Chen, Haitian Chen, Zibo Liang, Shuncheng Liu et al.VLDB 2023 · 52 citations
- Lero: A Learning-to-Rank Query OptimizerRong Zhu, Wei Chen, Bolin Ding, Xingguang Chen et al.VLDB 2023 · 102 citations
- Simple Adaptive Query Processing vs. Learned Query Optimizers: Observations and AnalysisYunjia Zhang, Yannis Chronis, Jignesh M. Patel, Theodoros RekatsinasVLDB 2023 · 20 citations
- FOSS: A Self-Learned Doctor for Query OptimizerKai Zhong, Luming Sun, Tao Ji, Cuiping Li et al.ICDE 2024 · 5 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be Query Optimizer for Relational Databases?Jie Tan, Kangfei Zhao, Rui Li, Jeffrey Xu Yu et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 6 citations
