T3: Accurate and Fast Performance Prediction for Relational Database Systems With Compiled Decision Trees
Maximilian Rieger, Thomas Neumann
Abstract
Query performance prediction is used for scheduling, resource scaling, tenant placement, and various other use-cases. Here, the main goal is to estimate the execution time of a query without running it. To be effective, predictors need to be both accurate and fast. In contrast, neural networks that were used in recent work deliver very accurate predictions but suffer from high latency. In this work, we propose the Tuple Time Tree (T3), a new model that is both accurate and fast. It is orders of magnitude faster than comparable methods and has competitive accuracy to state-of-the-art approaches. Additionally, T3 works for new database instances without re-training because it generalizes across database instances. We achieve T3's speed by relying on a low-latency decision tree model that is compiled to native machine code. We maintain high accuracy with two novel techniques: pipeline-based query plan representation and tuple-centric prediction targets. In our pipeline-based query plan representation, T3 decomposes query plans into pipelines. Then, T3 predicts the execution time of each pipeline individually, instead of the whole query in one step. With tuple-centric prediction targets, T3 predicts the expected time it takes to push a single tuple through a pipeline. It then multiplies this predicted value by the input cardinality of the pipeline to estimate its execution time. As a result, T3 achieves state-of-the-art accuracy with a low-latency decision tree model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1c2248a2-d7b4-4407-b632-caedcdfa2bbcCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- An End-to-End Learning-based Cost EstimatorJi Sun, Guoliang LiVLDB 2020 · 251 citations
- NeuroCard: One Cardinality Estimator for All TablesZongheng Yang, Amog Kamsetty, Sifei Luan, Eric Liang et al.VLDB 2021 · 138 citations
- QueryFormer: A Tree Transformer Model for Query Plan RepresentationYue Zhao, Gao Cong, Jiachen Shi, Chunyan MiaoVLDB 2022 · 117 citations
- Lero: A Learning-to-Rank Query OptimizerRong Zhu, Wei Chen, Bolin Ding, Xingguang Chen et al.VLDB 2023 · 102 citations
- Balsa: Learning a Query Optimizer Without Expert DemonstrationsZongheng Yang, Wei-Lin Chiang, Sifei Luan, Gautam Mittal et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 99 citations
Related papers
- Facilitating SQL Query Composition and AnalysisZainab Zolaktaf, Mostafa Milani, Rachel PottingerSIGMOD 2020 · 19 citations
- A Comparative Study and Component Analysis of Query Plan Representation Techniques in ML4DB StudiesYue Zhao, Zhaodonghui Li, Gao CongVLDB 2024 · 19 citations
- Eliminating Redundant Feature Tests in Decision Tree and Random Forest Inference on SQL PredicatesMingxi Liu, Zhengyuan Ding, Chenyang Zhang, Qingfeng Pan et al.SIGMOD 2026
- PlanRGCN: Predicting SPARQL Query PerformanceAbiram Mohanaraj, Matteo Lissandrini, Katja HoseVLDB 2025 · 2 citations
- Low Rank Learning for Offline Query OptimizationZixuan Yi, Yao Tian, Zachary G. Ives, Ryan MarcusSIGMOD 2025 · 4 citations
