This is Going to Sound Crazy, But What If We Used Large Language Models to Boost Automatic Database Tuning Algorithms By Leveraging Prior History? We Will Find Better Configurations More Quickly Than Retraining From Scratch!
William Zhang, Wan Shen Lim, Andrew Pavlo
Abstract
Tuning database management systems (DBMSs) is challenging due to trillions of possible configurations and evolving workloads. Recent advances in tuning have led to breakthroughs in optimizing over the possible configurations. However, due to their design and inability to leverage query-level historical insights, existing automated tuners struggle to adapt and re-optimize the DBMS when the environment changes (e.g., workload drift, schema transfer). This paper presents the Booster framework that assists existing tuners in adapting to environment changes (e.g., drift, cross-schema transfer). Booster structures historical artifacts into query-configuration contexts, prompts large language models (LLMs) to suggest configurations for each query based on relevant contexts, and then composes the query-level suggestions into a holistic configuration with beam search. With multiple OLAP workloads, we evaluate Booster's ability to assist different state-of-the-art tuners (e.g., cost-/machine learning-/LLM-based) in adapting to environment changes. By composing recommendations derived from query-level insights, Booster assists tuners in discovering configurations that are up to 74% better and in up to 4.7× less time than the alternative approach of continuing to tune from historical configurations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext edb69de7-eb6e-4839-b270-37a8598b9627Builds on55
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 citations
- Bao: Making Learned Query Optimization PracticalRyan Marcus, Parimarjan Negi, Hongzi Mao, Nesime Tatbul et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 242 citations
- Are We Ready For Learned Cardinality Estimation?Xiaoying Wang, Changbo Qu, Weiyuan Wu, Jiannan Wang et al.VLDB 2021 · 156 citations
Related papers
- λ-Tune: Harnessing Large Language Models for Automated Database System TuningVictor Giannakouris, Immanuel TrummerSIGMOD 2025 · 20 citations
- GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian OptimizationJiale Lao, Yibo Wang, Yufei Li, Jianping Wang et al.VLDB 2024 · 76 citations
- Automatic Database Configuration Debugging using Retrieval-Augmented Language ModelsSibei Chen, Ju Fan, Bin Wu, Nan Tang et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 12 citations
- Llmia: an Out-Of-The-Box Index Advisor Via in-Context Learning With LlmsXinxin Zhao, Xinmei Huang, Haoyang Li, Jing Zhang et al.ICDE 2026
- DB-BERT: A Database Tuning Tool that "Reads the Manual"Immanuel TrummerSIGMOD 2022 · 71 citations
