PrIDE: Achieving Secure Rowhammer Mitigation with Low-Cost In-DRAM Trackers
Aamer Jaleel, Gururaj Saileshwar, Stephen W. Keckler, Moinuddin K. Qureshi
Abstract
Rowhammer-induced bit-flips are a threat to DRAM security. To mitigate Rowhammer, DDR4 devices employ TRR, an in-DRAM tracker, to identify aggressor rows. In-DRAM trackers tend to be severely resource-constrained (1-30 entries), which means they cannot reliably track all the aggressor rows and are bound to fail for some access patterns. Unfortunately, for existing in-DRAM trackers, it is difficult to a priori determine how often they will fail when subjected to the worst-case pattern. Unsurprisingly, all the current low-cost in-DRAM trackers have been broken with specific access patterns within a few minutes. While provably secure alternatives for in-DRAM tracking exist, they require thousands of tracking entries, making them unappealing for commercial adoption. The goal of our paper is to develop a low-cost in-DRAM tracker that is secure (guarantees a time-to-failure in the range of years) against all access patterns.We contend that the root cause of the vulnerability of current low-cost in-DRAM trackers stems from the use of activation-counters to direct policy decisions (e.g. which rows to insert, which to evict, and which to mitigate). Therefore, an attacker can perform frequent accesses to dummy rows to evade the mitigation of an aggressor row. The key insight of our paper is that to ensure security, the policy decisions of an in-DRAM tracker must not depend on the access pattern. To that end, we propose a secure and low-cost in-DRAM tracker called PrIDE, which consists of a FIFO buffer with probabilistic insertion. As the policy decisions of PrIDE do not depend on the access pattern, we develop a framework to calculate the time-to-failure. Our analysis with DDR5 shows that PrIDE (with 4 entries, 10byte storage) can tolerate Rowhammer thresholds of 1.9 K while guaranteeing per-bank time-to-failure of more than 10,000 years for all access patterns. We also co-design PrIDE with RFM to tolerate thresholds as low as 400 with only slowdown. To the best of our knowledge, PrIDE is the first low-cost in-DRAM tracker to achieve provably secure Rowhammer mitigation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c42d5520-9847-4bdf-bb1c-5aeb6d1c2f62Cited by top-tier papers16
- MINT: Securely Mitigating Rowhammer with a Minimalist in-DRAM TrackerMoinuddin Qureshi, Salman Qazi, Aamer JaleelMICRO 2024 · 28 citations
- QPRAC: Towards Secure and Practical PRAC-based Rowhammer Mitigation using Priority QueuesJeonghyun Woo, Shaopeng Chris Lin, Prashant J. Nair, Aamer Jaleel et al.HPCA 2025 · 20 citations
- Variable Read Disturbance: An Experimental Analysis of Temporal Variation in DRAM Read DisturbanceAtaberk Olgun, F. Nisa Bostanci, Ismail Emir Yüksel, Oguzhan Canpolat et al.HPCA 2025 · 15 citations
- AutoRFM: Scaling Low-Cost in-DRAM Trackers to Ultra-Low Rowhammer ThresholdsMoinuddin QureshiHPCA 2025 · 15 citations
- MoPAC: Efficiently Mitigating Rowhammer with Probabilistic Activation CountingSuhas Vittal, Salman Qazi, Poulami Das, Moinuddin QureshiISCA 2025 · 13 citations
Builds on25
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss et al.CCS 2016 · 381 citations
- Another Flip in the Wall of Rowhammer DefensesDaniel Gruss, Moritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2018 · 288 citations
- TRRespass: Exploiting the Many Sides of Target Row RefreshPietro Frigo, Emanuele Vannacci, Hasan Hassan, Victor van der Veen et al.S&P 2020 · 274 citations
- RAMBleed: Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing ThemAndrew Kwong, Daniel Genkin, Daniel Gruss, Yuval YaromS&P 2020 · 239 citations
- Exploiting Correcting Codes: On the Effectiveness of ECC Memory Against Rowhammer AttacksLucian Cojocar, Kaveh Razavi, Cristiano Giuffrida, Herbert BosS&P 2019 · 233 citations
Related papers
- ProTRR: Principled yet Optimal In-DRAM Target Row RefreshMichele Marazzi, Patrick Jattke, Flavien Solt, Kaveh RazaviS&P 2022 · 101 citations
- Phoenix: Rowhammer Attacks on DDR5 with Self-Correcting SynchronizationDiego Meyer, Patrick Jattke, Michele Marazzi, Salman Qazi et al.S&P 2026 · 25 citations
- BLACKSMITH: Scalable Rowhammering in the Frequency DomainPatrick Jattke, Victor van der Veen, Pietro Frigo, Stijn Gunter et al.S&P 2022 · 140 citations
- Understanding RowHammer Under Reduced Refresh Latency: Experimental Analysis of Real DRAM Chips and Implications on Future SolutionsYahya Can Tugrul, A. Giray Yaglikçi, Ismail Emir Yüksel, Ataberk Olgun et al.HPCA 2025 · 10 citations
- BlockHammer: Preventing RowHammer at Low Cost by Blacklisting Rapidly-Accessed DRAM RowsAbdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Minesh Patel, Jeremie S. Kim, Roknoddin Azizi et al.HPCA 2021 · 124 citations
