Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Models
Zachary Ankner, Cody Blakeney, Kartik Sreenivasan, Max Marion, Matthew L. Leavitt, Mansheej Paul
Abstract
In this work, we investigate whether small language models can determine high-quality subsets of large-scale text datasets that improve the performance of larger language models. While existing work has shown that pruning based on the perplexity of a larger model can yield high-quality data, we investigate whether smaller models can be used for perplexity-based pruning and how pruning is affected by the domain composition of the data being pruned. We demonstrate that for multiple dataset compositions, perplexity-based pruning of pretraining data can significantly improve downstream task performance: pruning based on perplexities computed with a 125 million parameter model improves the average performance on downstream tasks of a 3 billion parameter model by up to 2.04 and achieves up to a reduction in pretraining steps to reach commensurate baseline performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that such perplexity-based data pruning also yields downstream performance gains in the over-trained and data-constrained regimes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c3e81af4-db9b-4d70-8509-4f8979d573aeCited by top-tier papers35
- The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That FitDylan Zhang, Qirun Dai, Hao PengNeurIPS 2025 · 59 citations
- Evaluating the Evaluator: Measuring LLMs' Adherence to Task Evaluation InstructionsBhuvanashree Murugadoss, Christian Pölitz, Ian Drosos, Vu Le et al.AAAI 2025 · 48 citations
- Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token LearningChao-Chung Wu, Zhi Rui Tam, Chieh-Yen Lin, Yun-Nung Vivian Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Towards High Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardXinyu Tang, Zhenduo Zhang, Yurou Liu, Xin Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- DataRater: Meta-Learned Dataset CurationDan Andrei Calian, Gregory Farquhar, Iurii Kemaev, Luisa M. Zintgraf et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
Builds on22
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative SamplesJoshua David Robinson, Ching-Yao Chuang, Suvrit Sra, Stefanie JegelkaICLR 2021 · 999 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
Related papers
- Scalable Data Ablation Approximations for Language Models through Modular Training and MergingClara Na, Ian Magnusson, Ananya Harsh Jha, Tom Sherborne et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- DRPruning: Efficient Large Language Model Pruning through Distributionally Robust OptimizationHexuan Deng, Wenxiang Jiao, Xuebo Liu, Jing Li et al.ACL 2025
- Predictive Data Selection: The Data That Predicts Is the Data That TeachesKaShun Shum, Yuzhen Huang, Hongjian Zou, Qi Ding et al.ICML 2025
- Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity CorrelationsTristan Thrush, Christopher Potts, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2025
- Instruction-Following Pruning for Large Language ModelsBairu Hou, Qibin Chen, Jianyu Wang, Guoli Yin et al.ICML 2025
