Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learning
Chao-Chung Wu, Zhi Rui Tam, Chieh-Yen Lin, Yun-Nung Vivian Chen, Shao-Hua Sun, Hung-yi Lee
Abstract
Maintaining consistent model performance across domains is a fundamental challenge in machine learning. While recent work has explored using LLM-generated data for fine-tuning, its impact on cross-domain generalization remains poorly understood. This paper presents a systematic analysis revealing that fine-tuning with LLM-generated data not only improves target task performance but also reduces non-target task degradation compared to fine-tuning with ground truth data. Through analyzing the data sequence in tasks of various domains, we demonstrate that this enhancement of non-target task robustness stems from the reduction of high perplexity tokens found in LLM-generated sequences. Following our findings, we showed that masking high perplexity tokens in ground truth training data achieves similar non-target task performance preservation, comparable to using LLM-generated data. Extensive experiments across different model families and scales, including Gemma 2 IT 2B, Llama 3 8B Instruct, and three additional models, agree with our findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to provide an empirical explanation based on token perplexity reduction to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in LLMs after fine-tuning, offering valuable insights for developing more robust fine-tuning strategies.
Recent work has shown that fine-tuning with model-generated data can be highly effective, often outperforming training on ground truth data when using high-quality generated samples [10, 32,
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 64e8a13d-278e-4d82-b112-0a4833404b7eCited by top-tier papers2
- Hyperion: Private Token Sampling with Homomorphic EncryptionLawrence Lim, Jiaming Liu, Vikas Kalagi, Divyakant Agrawal et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- OptProver: Bridging Olympiad and Optimization through Continual Training in Formal Theorem ProvingChenyi Li, Yanchen Nie, Zhenyu Ming, Gong Zhang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
Related papers
- Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-TuningZhaorui Yang, Tianyu Pang, Haozhe Feng, Han Wang et al.ACL 2024
- Analyzing the Effects of Supervised Fine-Tuning on Model Knowledge from Token and Parameter LevelsJunjie Ye, Yuming Yang, Yang Nan, Shuo Li et al.EMNLP 2025
- SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMsJiacheng Lin, Zhongruo Wang, Kun Qian, Tian Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 25 citations
- TAIA: Large Language Models are Out-of-Distribution Data LearnersShuyang Jiang, Yusheng Liao, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Preserving Pre-trained Features Helps Calibrate Fine-tuned Language ModelsGuande He, Jianfei Chen, Jun ZhuICLR 2023 · 1 citation
