A Good Fishman Knows All the Angles: A Critical Evaluation of Google's Phishing Page Classifier
Changqing Miao, Jianan Feng, Wei You, Wenchang Shi, Jianjun Huang, Bin Liang
Abstract
Phishing is one of the most popular cyberspace attacks. Phishing detection has been integrated into mainstream browsers to provide online protection. The phishing detector of Google Chrome reports millions of phishing attacks per week. However, it has been proven to be vulnerable to evasion attacks. Currently, Google has upgraded Chrome/Chromium's phishing detector, introducing a CNN-based image classifier. The robustness of the new-generation detector is unclear. If it can be bypassed, its billions of users will be exposed to sophisticated attackers. This paper presents a critical evaluation of Google's phishing detector by targeted evasion testing, and investigates corresponding defensive techniques. First, we propose a three-stage evasion method against the phishing image classifier. The experiments show that it can be completely bypassed with adversarial phishing pages generated using the proposed method. Meanwhile, the phishing pages still preserve their visual utility. Second, we introduce two defense techniques to enhance the phishing detection model. The results show that even using lightweight defense methods can significantly improve the model robustness. Our research reveals that Google's new-generation phishing classifier is very vulnerable to targeted evasion attacks. A sophisticated phishers can know how to fool the classifier. Billions of Chrome users are being exposed to potential phishing attacks. To improve its robustness, necessary security enhancements should be introduced.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c3db4fba-9d3f-434c-bdb4-cfc5faff4a78Cited by top-tier papers2
- Fight Fire with Fire: Combating Adversarial Patch Attacks using Pattern-randomized Defensive PatchesJianan Feng, Jiachun Li, Changqing Miao, Jianjun Huang et al.S&P 2025
- SoK: PHILTER: Uncovering Security and Functional Gaps in AI-based Phishing Website Detection Literature via an LLM-based Reasoning FrameworkMahbub Alam, Muhammad Lutfor Rahman, Sonjoy Kumar Paul, Amy W. Hays et al.USENIX Security 2026
Builds on3
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face RecognitionMahmood Sharif, Sruti Bhagavatula, Lujo Bauer, Michael K. ReiterCCS 2016 · 1,765 citations
- VisualPhishNet: Zero-Day Phishing Website Detection by Visual SimilaritySahar Abdelnabi, Katharina Krombholz, Mario FritzCCS 2020 · 5 citations
Related papers
- PhishLang: A Real-Time, Fully Client-Side Phishing Detection Framework Using MobileBERTSayak Saha Roy, Shirin NilizadehNDSS 2026 · 9 citations
- Evaluating the Effectiveness and Robustness of Visual Similarity-based Phishing Detection ModelsFujiao Ji, Kiho Lee, Hyungjoon Koo, Wenhao You et al.USENIX Security 2025
- CrawlPhish: Large-scale Analysis of Client-side Cloaking Techniques in PhishingPenghui Zhang, Adam Oest, Haehyun Cho, Zhibo Sun et al.S&P 2021 · 1 citation
- Phishing URL Detection: A Network-based Approach Robust to EvasionTaeri Kim, Noseong Park, Jiwon Hong, Sang-Wook KimCCS 2022 · 21 citations
- PhishDecloaker: Detecting CAPTCHA-cloaked Phishing Websites via Hybrid Vision-based Interactive ModelsXiwen Teoh, Yun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Zhiyong Huang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
