CrawlPhish: Large-scale Analysis of Client-side Cloaking Techniques in Phishing
Penghui Zhang, Adam Oest, Haehyun Cho, Zhibo Sun, RC Johnson, Brad Wardman, Shaown Sarker, Alexandros Kapravelos, Tiffany Bao, Ruoyu Wang, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Adam Doupé, Gail-Joon Ahn
Abstract
Phishing is a critical threat to Internet users. Although an extensive ecosystem serves to protect users, phishing websites are growing in sophistication, and they can slip past the ecosystem's detection systems-and subsequently cause realworld damage-with the help of evasion techniques. Sophisticated client-side evasion techniques, known as cloaking, leverage JavaScript to enable complex interactions between potential victims and the phishing website, and can thus be particularly effective in slowing or entirely preventing automated mitigations. Yet, neither the prevalence nor the impact of client-side cloaking has been studied. In this paper, we present CrawlPhish, a framework for automatically detecting and categorizing client-side cloaking used by known phishing websites. We deploy CrawlPhish over 14 months between 2018 and 2019 to collect and thoroughly analyze a dataset of 112,005 phishing websites in the wild. By adapting state-of-the-art static and dynamic code analysis, we find that 35,067 of these websites have 1,128 distinct implementations of client-side cloaking techniques. Moreover, we find that attackers' use of cloaking grew from 23.32% initially to 33.70% by the end of our data collection period. Detection of cloaking by our framework exhibited low false-positive and false-negative rates of 1.45% and 1.75%, respectively. We analyze the semantics of the techniques we detected and propose a taxonomy of eight types of evasion across three high-level categories: User Interaction, Fingerprinting, and Bot Behavior. Using 150 artificial phishing websites, we empirically show that each category of evasion technique is effective in avoiding browser-based phishing detection (a key ecosystem defense). Additionally, through a user study, we verify that the techniques generally do not discourage victim visits. Therefore, we propose ways in which our methodology can be used to not only improve the ecosystem's ability to mitigate phishing websites with clientside cloaking, but also continuously identify emerging cloaking techniques as they are launched by attackers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b952474d-b565-4cd6-8450-f9dba96cc72cCited by top-tier papers34
- Phishpedia: A Hybrid Deep Learning Based Approach to Visually Identify Phishing WebpagesYun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Dinil Mon Divakaran, Jun Yang Ng et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 164 citations
- Catching Phishers By Their Bait: Investigating the Dutch Phishing Landscape through Phishing Kit DetectionHugo L. J. Bijmans, Tim M. Booij, Anneke Schwedersky, Aria Nedgabat et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 61 citations
- Beyond Bot Detection: Combating Fraudulent Online Survey Takers✱Ziyi Zhang, Shuofei Zhu, Jaron Mink, Aiping Xiong et al.WWW 2022 · 51 citations
- Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO ProtocolsEnis Ulqinaku, Hala Assal, AbdelRahman Abdou, Sonia Chiasson et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 42 citations
- TxPhishScope: Towards Detecting and Understanding Transaction-based Phishing on EthereumBowen He, Yuan Chen, Zhuo Chen, Xiaohui Hu et al.CCS 2023 · 38 citations
Builds on8
- Data Breaches, Phishing, or Malware?: Understanding the Risks of Stolen CredentialsKurt Thomas, Frank Li, Ali Zand, Jacob Barrett et al.CCS 2017 · 248 citations
- PhishFarm: A Scalable Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Evasion Techniques against Browser Phishing BlacklistsAdam Oest, Yeganeh Safaei, Adam Doupé, Gail-Joon Ahn et al.S&P 2019 · 129 citations
- Detecting and Characterizing Lateral Phishing at ScaleGrant Ho, Asaf Cidon, Lior Gavish, Marco Schweighauser et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 113 citations
- Cognitive Triaging of Phishing AttacksAmber van der Heijden, Luca AllodiUSENIX Security 2019 · 100 citations
- Cloak of Visibility: Detecting When Machines Browse a Different WebLuca Invernizzi, Kurt Thomas, Alexandros Kapravelos, Oxana Comanescu et al.S&P 2016 · 93 citations
Related papers
- PhishTime: Continuous Longitudinal Measurement of the Effectiveness of Anti-phishing BlacklistsAdam Oest, Yeganeh Safaei, Penghui Zhang, Brad Wardman et al.USENIX Security 2020
- PhishPrint: Evading Phishing Detection Crawlers by Prior ProfilingBhupendra Acharya, Phani VadrevuUSENIX Security 2021 · 37 citations
- PhishDecloaker: Detecting CAPTCHA-cloaked Phishing Websites via Hybrid Vision-based Interactive ModelsXiwen Teoh, Yun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Zhiyong Huang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
- Phishing Vs. Legit: Comparative Analysis of Client-Side Resources of Phishing and Target Brand WebsitesKyungchan Lim, Jaehwan Park, Doowon KimWWW 2024 · 11 citations
- A Good Fishman Knows All the Angles: A Critical Evaluation of Google's Phishing Page ClassifierChangqing Miao, Jianan Feng, Wei You, Wenchang Shi et al.CCS 2023 · 2 citations
