A Connection between One-Step RL and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement Learning
Benjamin Eysenbach, Matthieu Geist, Sergey Levine, Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Abstract
As with any machine learning problem with limited data, effective offline RL algorithms require careful regularization to avoid overfitting. One class of methods, known as one-step RL, perform just one step of policy improvement. These methods, which include advantage-weighted regression and conditional behavioral cloning, are thus simple and stable, but can have limited asymptotic performance. A second class of methods, known as critic regularization, perform many steps of policy improvement with a regularized objective. These methods typically require more compute but have appealing lower-bound guarantees. In this paper, we draw a connection between these methods: applying a multi-step critic regularization method with a regularization coefficient of 1 yields the same policy as one-step RL. While our theoretical results require assumptions (e.g., deterministic dynamics), our experiments nevertheless show that our analysis makes accurate, testable predictions about practical offline RL methods (CQL and one-step RL) with commonly-used hyperparameters.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c36c87fa-7444-4617-8037-00fc9b66ec00Cited by top-tier papers4
- Offline Goal-conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Quasimetric RepresentationsVivek Myers, Bill Zheng, Benjamin Eysenbach, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- Behaviour Preference Regression for Offline Reinforcement LearningPadmanaba Srinivasan, William KnottenbeltAAAI 2025
- Learning to Trust Bellman Updates: Selective State-Adaptive Regularization for Offline RLQin-Wen Luo, Ming-Kun Xie, Ye-Wen Wang, Sheng-Jun HuangICML 2025
- RD-HRL: Generating Reliable Sub-Goals for Long-Horizon Sparse-Reward TasksYixiang Shan, Haipeng Liu, Ting Long, Yi ChangICLR 2026
Builds on21
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
Related papers
- Offline RL Without Off-Policy EvaluationDavid Brandfonbrener, Will Whitney, Rajesh Ranganath, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2021 · 217 citations
- Peng's Q(π) for Conservative Value Estimation in Offline Reinforcement LearningByeongchan Kim, Min-hwan OhICLR 2026
- Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- Critic Regularized RegressionZiyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic RegularizationIlya Kostrikov, Rob Fergus, Jonathan Tompson, Ofir NachumICML 2021 · 350 citations
