Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization
Ilya Kostrikov, Rob Fergus, Jonathan Tompson, Ofir Nachum
Abstract
Many modern approaches to offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) utilize behavior regularization, typically augmenting a model-free actor critic algorithm with a penalty measuring divergence of the policy from the offline data. In this work, we propose an alternative approach to encouraging the learned policy to stay close to the data, namely parameterizing the critic as the logbehavior-policy, which generated the offline data, plus a state-action value offset term, which can be learned using a neural network. Behavior regularization then corresponds to an appropriate regularizer on the offset term. We propose using a gradient penalty regularizer for the offset term and demonstrate its equivalence to Fisher divergence regularization, suggesting connections to the score matching and generative energy-based model literature. We thus term our resulting algorithm Fisher-BRC (Behavior Regularized Critic). On standard offline RL benchmarks, Fisher-BRC achieves both improved performance and faster convergence over existing state-of-the-art methods. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f9a7832b-1530-4a1e-ad43-2367b1a81273Cited by top-tier papers149
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Aviral Kumar, Rafael Rafailov, Aravind Rajeswaran et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 549 citations
- Behavior Transformers: Cloning modes with one stoneNur Muhammad Shafiullah, Zichen Jeff Cui, Ariuntuya Altanzaya, Lerrel PintoNeurIPS 2022 · 470 citations
- Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-TuningMitsuhiko Nakamoto, Simon Zhai, Anikait Singh, Max Sobol Mark et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 296 citations
Builds on6
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkJoost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalICML 2020 · 529 citations
- Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution DataPolina Kirichenko, Pavel Izmailov, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2020 · 370 citations
- Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Model-Based Offline OptimizationTatsuya Matsushima, Hiroki Furuta, Yutaka Matsuo, Ofir Nachum et al.ICLR 2021 · 166 citations
- Model-Based Offline PlanningArthur Argenson, Gabriel Dulac-ArnoldICLR 2021 · 20 citations
Related papers
- An Implicit Trust Region Approach to Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement LearningZhe Zhang, Xiaoyang TanAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- A Connection between One-Step RL and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement LearningBenjamin Eysenbach, Matthieu Geist, Sergey Levine, Ruslan SalakhutdinovICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Mutual Information Regularized Offline Reinforcement LearningXiao Ma, Bingyi Kang, Zhongwen Xu, Min Lin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- Behavior-Regularized Diffusion Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement LearningChen-Xiao Gao, Chenyang Wu, Mingjun Cao, Chenjun Xiao et al.ICML 2025
