Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluation
David Brandfonbrener, Will Whitney, Rajesh Ranganath, Joan Bruna
Abstract
Most prior approaches to offline reinforcement learning (RL) have taken an iterative actor-critic approach involving off-policy evaluation. In this paper we show that simply doing one step of constrained/regularized policy improvement using an on-policy Q estimate of the behavior policy performs surprisingly well. This one-step algorithm beats the previously reported results of iterative algorithms on a large portion of the D4RL benchmark. The one-step baseline achieves this strong performance while being notably simpler and more robust to hyperparameters than previously proposed iterative algorithms. We argue that the relatively poor performance of iterative approaches is a result of the high variance inherent in doing off-policy evaluation and magnified by the repeated optimization of policies against those estimates. In addition, we hypothesize that the strong performance of the one-step algorithm is due to a combination of favorable structure in the environment and behavior policy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers89
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?Scott Emmons, Benjamin Eysenbach, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 225 citations
- Efficient Diffusion Policies For Offline Reinforcement LearningBingyi Kang, Xiao Ma, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 195 citations
- HIQL: Offline Goal-Conditioned RL with Latent States as ActionsSeohong Park, Dibya Ghosh, Benjamin Eysenbach, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2023 · 173 citations
- RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningMarc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick HawesNeurIPS 2022 · 168 citations
Builds on10
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Critic Regularized RegressionZiyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic RegularizationIlya Kostrikov, Rob Fergus, Jonathan Tompson, Ofir NachumICML 2021 · 350 citations
- Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement LearningNoah Y. Siegel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Felix Berkenkamp, Abbas Abdolmaleki et al.ICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?Ruosong Wang, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. KakadeICLR 2021 · 172 citations
Related papers
- A Connection between One-Step RL and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement LearningBenjamin Eysenbach, Matthieu Geist, Sergey Levine, Ruslan SalakhutdinovICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Peng's Q(π) for Conservative Value Estimation in Offline Reinforcement LearningByeongchan Kim, Min-hwan OhICLR 2026
- Iteratively Refined Behavior Regularization for Offline Reinforcement LearningYi Ma, Jianye Hao, Xiaohan Hu, Yan Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Policy Improvement OperatorsJiachen Li, Edwin Zhang, Ming Yin, Qinxun Bai et al.ICML 2023 · 18 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
