ACL Findings2025
PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistants
Zheng Zhao, Clara Vania, Subhradeep Kayal, Naila Khan, Shay B. Cohen, Emine Yilmaz
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced conversational AI assistants. However, systematically evaluating how well these assistants apply personalization-adapting to individual user preferences while completing tasks-remains challenging. Existing personalization benchmarks focus on chit-chat, nonconversational tasks, or narrow domains, failing to capture the complexities of personalized task-oriented assistance. To address this, we introduce PersonaLens, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating personalization in task-oriented AI assistants. Our benchmark features diverse user profiles equipped with rich preferences and interaction histories, along with two specialized LLM-based agents: a user agent that engages in realistic task-oriented dialogues with AI assistants, and a judge agent that employs the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm to assess personalization, response quality, and task success. Through extensive experiments with current LLM assistants across diverse tasks, we reveal significant variability in their personalization capabilities, providing crucial insights for advancing conversational AI systems.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 7 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Towards Personalized Deep Research: Benchmarks and EvaluationsYuan Liang, Jiaxian Li, Yuqing Wang, Piaohong Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Instant Personalized Large Language Model Adaptation via HypernetworkZhaoxuan Tan, Zixuan Zhang, Haoyang Wen, Zheng Li et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational AgentsNikhil Sharma, Zheng Zhang, Daniel Lee, Namita Krishnan et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- EmoHarbor: Evaluating Personalized Emotional Support by Simulating the User's Internal WorldJing Ye, Lu Xiang, Yaping Zhang, Chengqing ZongACL 2026 · 2 citations
- After Talking with 1,000 Personas: Learning Preference-Aligned Proactive Assistants from Large-Scale Simulated Persona InteractionsZiyi Xuan, Yiwen Wu, Zhaoyang Yan, Vinod Namboodiri et al.UbiComp 2026
Builds on16
- Towards Scalable Multi-Domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue DatasetAbhinav Rastogi, Xiaoxue Zang, Srinivas Sunkara, Raghav Gupta et al.AAAI 2020 · 707 citations
- CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator NeedsMajeed Kazemitabaar, Runlong Ye, Xiaoning Wang, Austin Zachary Henley et al.CHI 2024 · 246 citations
- Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference LearningSriyash Poddar, Yanming Wan, Hamish Ivison, Abhishek Gupta et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 188 citations
- Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older AdultsZiqi Yang, Xuhai Xu, Bingsheng Yao, Ethan Rogers et al.UbiComp 2024 · 116 citations
- Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-PlayingYunfan Shao, Linyang Li, Junqi Dai, Xipeng QiuEMNLP 2023 · 97 citations
Related papers
- Exploring the Potential of LLMs as Personalized Assistants: Dataset, Evaluation, and AnalysisJisoo Mok, Ik-hwan Kim, Sangkwon Park, Sungroh YoonACL 2025 · 10 citations
- SenseJudge: Human-Centric Preference-Driven Judgment FrameworkRui Li, Junfeng Liu, Xiangwen Kong, Zhifang SuiACL Findings 2026
- Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?Yijiang River Dong, Tiancheng Hu, Nigel CollierEMNLP Findings 2024 · 24 citations
- Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMsSiyan Zhao, Mingyi Hong, Yang Liu, Devamanyu Hazarika et al.ICLR 2025
- LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied AgentsJae-Woo Choi, Youngwoo Yoon, Hyobin Ong, Jaehong Kim et al.ICLR 2024 · 49 citations
