"If I Had All the Time in the World": Ophthalmologists' Perceptions of Anchoring Bias Mitigation in Clinical AI Support
Anne Kathrine Petersen Bach, Trine Munch Nørgaard, Jens Christian Brok, Niels van Berkel
Abstract
Clinical needs and technological advances have resulted in increased use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in clinical decision support. However, such support can introduce new and amplify existing cognitive biases. Through contextual inquiry and interviews, we set out to understand the use of an existing AI support system by ophthalmologists. We identified concerns regarding anchoring bias and a misunderstanding of the AI’s capabilities. Following, we evaluated clinicians’ perceptions of three bias mitigation strategies as integrated into their existing decision support system. While clinicians recognised the danger of anchoring bias, we identified a concern around the impact of bias mitigation on procedure time. Our participants were divided in their expectations of any positive impact on diagnostic accuracy, stemming from varying reliance on the decision support. Our results provide insights into the challenges of integrating bias mitigation into AI decision support.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c25772ae-768f-4811-92c7-dae19de12972Cited by top-tier papers12
- Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for RadiologyNur Yildirim, Hannah Richardson, Maria Teodora Wetscherek, Junaid Bajwa et al.CHI 2024 · 81 citations
- Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial ExplanationsSander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, Niels van BerkelCSCW 2025 · 32 citations
- "It Is a Moving Process": Understanding the Evolution of Explainability Needs of Clinicians in Pulmonary MedicineLorenzo Corti, Rembrandt Oltmans, Jiwon Jung, Agathe Balayn et al.CHI 2024 · 21 citations
- How Do HCI Researchers Study Cognitive Biases? A Scoping ReviewNattapat Boonprakong, Benjamin Tag, Jorge Gonçalves, Tilman DinglerCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- "When Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" - Examining Confirmation Bias and the Role of Time Pressure During Human-AI Collaboration in Computational PathologyEmely Rosbach, Jonas Ammeling, Sebastian Krügel, Angelika Kießig et al.CHI 2025 · 17 citations
Builds on10
- A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic RetinopathyEmma Beede, Elizabeth Elliott Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko et al.CHI 2020 · 589 citations
- Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual DifferencesRuotong Wang, F. Maxwell Harper, Haiyi ZhuCHI 2020 · 209 citations
- "Brilliant AI Doctor" in Rural Clinics: Challenges in AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support System DeploymentDakuo Wang, Liuping Wang, Zhan Zhang, Ding Wang et al.CHI 2021 · 207 citations
- Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingCharvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney et al.CSCW 2022 · 184 citations
- How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case StudyDavid Piorkowski, Soya Park, April Yi Wang, Dakuo Wang et al.CSCW 2021 · 142 citations
Related papers
- AI Shall Have No Dominion: on How to Measure Technology Dominance in AI-supported Human decision-makingFederico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Riccardo Angius, Chiara Natali et al.CHI 2023 · 47 citations
- The Role of Heuristics and Biases during Complex Choices with an AI TeammateNikolos Gurney, John H. Miller, David V. PynadathAAAI 2023 · 5 citations
- Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software EngineeringFrancesco Sovrano, Gabriele Dominici, Alberto BacchelliFSE 2026
- AI-Moderated Decision-Making: Capturing and Balancing Anchoring Bias in Sequential Decision TasksJessica Maria Echterhoff, Matin Yarmand, Julian J. McAuleyCHI 2022 · 29 citations
- Who is Trusted for a Second Opinion? Comparing Collective Advice from a Medical AI and Physicians in Biopsy Decisions After Mammography ScreeningHenrik H. J. Detjen, Lars Densky, Niklas von Kalckreuth, Marvin KopkaCHI 2025 · 12 citations
