AI Shall Have No Dominion: on How to Measure Technology Dominance in AI-supported Human decision-making
Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Riccardo Angius, Chiara Natali, Carlo Reverberi
Abstract
In this article, we propose a conceptual and methodological framework for measuring the impact of the introduction of AI systems in decision settings, based on the concept of technological dominance, i.e. the influence that an AI system can exert on human judgment and decisions. We distinguish between a negative component of dominance (automation bias) and a positive one (algorithm appreciation) by focusing on and systematizing the patterns of interaction between human judgment and AI support, or reliance patterns, and their associated cognitive effects. We then define statistical approaches for measuring these dimensions of dominance, as well as corresponding qualitative visualizations. By reporting about four medical case studies, we illustrate how the proposed methods can be used to inform assessments of dominance and of related cognitive biases in real-world settings. Our study lays the groundwork for future investigations into the effects of introducing AI support into naturalistic and collaborative decision-making.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get e1afbecf-0e14-4c9d-82c6-53fdce2b35a2Cited by top-tier papers5
- Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is MadeOleksandra Vereschak, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste CaramiauxCHI 2024 · 31 citations
- How Do HCI Researchers Study Cognitive Biases? A Scoping ReviewNattapat Boonprakong, Benjamin Tag, Jorge Gonçalves, Tilman DinglerCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- Human Delegation Behavior in Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of Contextual InformationPhilipp Spitzer, Joshua Holstein, Patrick Hemmer, Michael Vössing et al.CSCW 2025 · 16 citations
- Do People Appropriately Rely on AI-Advice? An Analytical Review of HCI Research on Human-AI Decision-MakingMuhammad Raees, Vassilis-Javed Khan, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Konstantinos PapangelisCHI 2026 · 6 citations
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Frameworks in HCIShitao Fang, Koji Yatani, Kasper HornbækCHI 2026 · 4 citations
Related papers
- "If I Had All the Time in the World": Ophthalmologists' Perceptions of Anchoring Bias Mitigation in Clinical AI SupportAnne Kathrine Petersen Bach, Trine Munch Nørgaard, Jens Christian Brok, Niels van BerkelCHI 2023 · 46 citations
- Who is the Expert? Reconciling Algorithm Aversion and Algorithm Appreciation in AI-Supported Decision MakingYoyo Tsung-Yu Hou, Malte F. JungCSCW 2021 · 111 citations
- "When Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" - Examining Confirmation Bias and the Role of Time Pressure During Human-AI Collaboration in Computational PathologyEmely Rosbach, Jonas Ammeling, Sebastian Krügel, Angelika Kießig et al.CHI 2025 · 17 citations
- Modeling Human Trust and Reliance in AI-Assisted Decision Making: A Markovian ApproachZhuoyan Li, Zhuoran Lu, Ming YinAAAI 2023 · 28 citations
- Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingCharvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney et al.CSCW 2022 · 184 citations
