AI-Moderated Decision-Making: Capturing and Balancing Anchoring Bias in Sequential Decision Tasks
Jessica Maria Echterhoff, Matin Yarmand, Julian J. McAuley
Abstract
Decision-making involves biases from past experiences, which are difficult to perceive and eliminate. We investigate a specific type of anchoring bias, in which decision-makers are anchored by their own recent decisions, e.g. a college admission officer sequentially reviewing students. We propose an algorithm that identifies existing anchored decisions, reduces sequential dependencies to previous decisions, and mitigates decision inaccuracies post-hoc with 2% increased agreement to ground-truth on a large-scale college admission decision data set. A crowd-sourced study validates this algorithm on product preferences (5% increased agreement). To avoid biased decisions ex-ante, we propose a procedure that presents instances in an order that reduces anchoring bias in real-time. Tested in another crowd-sourced study, it reduces bias and increases agreement to ground-truth by 7%. Our work reinforces individuals with similar characteristics to be treated similarly, independent of when they were reviewed in the decision-making process.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 8cfe85b7-b874-4628-ab6e-c8a950c3f653Cited by top-tier papers11
- Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Ying Lei, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2023 · 139 citations
- Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Qiaoyi Chen, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2025 · 113 citations
- "If I Had All the Time in the World": Ophthalmologists' Perceptions of Anchoring Bias Mitigation in Clinical AI SupportAnne Kathrine Petersen Bach, Trine Munch Nørgaard, Jens Christian Brok, Niels van BerkelCHI 2023 · 46 citations
- Dealing with Uncertainty: Understanding the Impact of Prognostic Versus Diagnostic Tasks on Trust and Reliance in Human-AI Decision MakingSara Salimzadeh, Gaole He, Ujwal GadirajuCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial ExplanationsSander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, Niels van BerkelCSCW 2025 · 32 citations
Related papers
- Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingCharvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney et al.CSCW 2022 · 184 citations
- Studying the Effects of Cognitive Biases in Evaluation of Conversational AgentsSashank Santhanam, Alireza Karduni, Samira ShaikhCHI 2020 · 18 citations
- (De)Noise: Moderating the Inconsistency Between Human Decision-MakersNina Grgic-Hlaca, Junaid Ali, Krishna P. Gummadi, Jennifer Wortman VaughanCSCW 2024 · 2 citations
- Intelligent Calibration for Bias Reduction in Sentiment Corpora Annotation ProcessIdan Toker, David Sarne, Jonathan SchlerAAAI 2024 · 3 citations
- The Role of Heuristics and Biases during Complex Choices with an AI TeammateNikolos Gurney, John H. Miller, David V. PynadathAAAI 2023 · 5 citations
