Lune

CHI2022Top-tier venue

AI-Moderated Decision-Making: Capturing and Balancing Anchoring Bias in Sequential Decision Tasks

Jessica Maria Echterhoff, Matin Yarmand, Julian J. McAuley

2022Year
29Citations
11Top-tier citations

Abstract

Decision-making involves biases from past experiences, which are difficult to perceive and eliminate. We investigate a specific type of anchoring bias, in which decision-makers are anchored by their own recent decisions, e.g. a college admission officer sequentially reviewing students. We propose an algorithm that identifies existing anchored decisions, reduces sequential dependencies to previous decisions, and mitigates decision inaccuracies post-hoc with 2% increased agreement to ground-truth on a large-scale college admission decision data set. A crowd-sourced study validates this algorithm on product preferences (5% increased agreement). To avoid biased decisions ex-ante, we propose a procedure that presents instances in an order that reduces anchoring bias in real-time. Tested in another crowd-sourced study, it reduces bias and increases agreement to ground-truth by 7%. Our work reinforces individuals with similar characteristics to be treated similarly, independent of when they were reviewed in the decision-making process.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get 8cfe85b7-b874-4628-ab6e-c8a950c3f653

Cited by top-tier papers11

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines