Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative Approach
Weicong Qin, Zelin Cao, Weijie Yu, Zihua Si, Sirui Chen, Jun Xu
Abstract
Legal document retrieval and judgment prediction are crucial tasks in intelligent legal systems. In practice, determining whether two documents share the same judgments is essential for establishing their relevance in legal retrieval. However, existing legal retrieval studies either ignore the vital role of judgment prediction or rely on implicit training objectives, expecting a proper alignment of legal documents in vector space based on their judgments. Neither approach provides explicit evidence of judgment consistency for relevance modeling, leading to inaccuracies and a lack of transparency in retrieval. To address this issue, we propose a law-guided method, namely GEAR, within the generative retrieval framework. GEAR explicitly integrates judgment prediction with legal document retrieval in a sequence-to-sequence manner. Specifically, given the intricate nature of legal documents, we first extract rationales from documents based on the definition of charges in law. We then employ these rationales as queries, ensuring efficiency and producing a shared, informative document representation for both tasks. Second, in accordance with the inherent hierarchy of law, we construct a law structure constraint tree and represent each candidate document as a hierarchical semantic ID based on this tree. This empowers GEAR to perform dual predictions for judgment and relevant documents in a single inference, i.e., traversing the tree from the root through intermediate judgment nodes, to document-specific leaf nodes. Third, we devise the revision loss that jointly minimizes the discrepancy between the IDs of predicted and labeled judgments, as well as retrieved documents, thus improving accuracy and consistency for both tasks. Extensive experiments on two Chinese legal case retrieval datasets show the superiority of GEAR over state-of-the-art methods while maintaining competitive judgment prediction performance. Moreover, we validate the effectiveness of GEAR on a French statutory article retrieval dataset, reaffirming its robustness across languages and domains.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c23c66fc-3d5a-42fc-8589-a67f91ce15c3Cited by top-tier papers3
- JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal ReasoningHuanghai Liu, Quzhe Huang, Qingjing Chen, Yiran Hu et al.EMNLP 2025
- IL-PCSR: Legal Corpus for Prior Case and Statute RetrievalShounak Paul, Dhananjay Ghumare, Pawan Goyal, Saptarshi Ghosh et al.EMNLP 2025
- UniLR: Unleashing the Power of LLMs on Multiple Legal Tasks with a Unified Legal RetrieverAng Li, Yiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Ming Cai et al.ACL 2025
Builds on12
- Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text RetrievalLee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,547 citations
- Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search IndexYi Tay, Vinh Tran, Mostafa Dehghani, Jianmo Ni et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 506 citations
- A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document RetrievalYujing Wang, Yingyan Hou, Haonan Wang, Ziming Miao et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 242 citations
- Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Recommender SystemsXin Xin, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Ioannis Arapakis, Joemon M. JoseSIGIR 2020 · 217 citations
- Autoregressive Entity RetrievalNicola De Cao, Gautier Izacard, Sebastian Riedel, Fabio PetroniICLR 2021 · 200 citations
Related papers
- SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case RetrievalHaitao Li, Qingyao Ai, Jia Chen, Qian Dong et al.SIGIR 2023 · 68 citations
- GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case RetrievalMinghan Li, Tianrui Lv, Chao Zhang, Guodong ZhouACL 2026 · 1 citation
- CFGL-LCR: A Counterfactual Graph Learning Framework for Legal Case RetrievalKun Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, Qi Tian et al.KDD 2023 · 9 citations
- LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal ReasoningZerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Zhishang Xiang, Zhimin Wei et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 33 citations
