CFGL-LCR: A Counterfactual Graph Learning Framework for Legal Case Retrieval
Kun Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, Qi Tian, Long Bai
Abstract
Legal case retrieval, which aims to find relevant cases based on a short case description, serves as an important part of modern legal systems. Despite the success of existing retrieval methods based on Pretrained Language Models, there are still two issues in legal case retrieval that have not been well considered before. First, existing methods underestimate the semantics associations among legal elements, e.g., law articles and crimes, which played an essential role in legal case retrieval. These methods only adopt the pre-training language model to encode the whole legal case, instead of distinguishing different legal elements in the legal case. They randomly split a legal case into different segments, which may break the completeness of each legal element. Second, due to the difficulty in annotating the relevant labels of similar cases, legal case retrieval inevitably faces the problem of lacking training data. In this paper, we propose a counterfactual graph learning framework for legal case retrieval. Concretely, to overcome the above challenges, we transform the legal case document into a graph and model the semantics of the legal elements through a graph neural network. To alleviate the low resource and learn the causal relationship between the semantics of legal elements and relevance, a counterfactual data generator is designed to augment counterfactual data and enhance legal case representation. Extensive experiments based on two publicly available legal benchmarks demonstrate that our CFGL-LCR can significantly outperform previous state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b67eb8f4-672b-4eed-9144-00e3ba91dcc6Cited by top-tier papers6
- Tree-of-Reasoning Question Decomposition for Complex Question Answering with Large Language ModelsKun Zhang, Jiali Zeng, Fandong Meng, Yuanzhuo Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 14 citations
- CaseLink: Inductive Graph Learning for Legal Case RetrievalYanran Tang, Ruihong Qiu, Hongzhi Yin, Xue Li et al.SIGIR 2024 · 10 citations
- Motif-Consistent Counterfactuals with Adversarial Refinement for Graph-level Anomaly DetectionChunjing Xiao, Shikang Pang, Wenxin Tai, Yanlong Huang et al.KDD 2024 · 5 citations
- LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements GenerationChaeeun Kim, Jinu Lee, Wonseok HwangEMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case ReformulationChenlong Deng, Kelong Mao, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
Related papers
- UniLR: Unleashing the Power of LLMs on Multiple Legal Tasks with a Unified Legal RetrieverAng Li, Yiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Ming Cai et al.ACL 2025
- SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case RetrievalHaitao Li, Qingyao Ai, Jia Chen, Qian Dong et al.SIGIR 2023 · 68 citations
- Enhancing Legal Case Retrieval via Scaling High-quality Synthetic Query-Candidate PairsCheng Gao, Chaojun Xiao, Zhenghao Liu, Huimin Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- DELTA: Pre-Train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word AlignmentHaitao Li, Qingyao Ai, Xinyan Han, Jia Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Law Article-Enhanced Legal Case Matching: A Causal Learning ApproachZhongxiang Sun, Jun Xu, Xiao Zhang, Zhenhua Dong et al.SIGIR 2023 · 25 citations
