JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning
Huanghai Liu, Quzhe Huang, Qingjing Chen, Yiran Hu, Jiayu Ma, Yun Liu, Weixing Shen, Yansong Feng
Abstract
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely applied to legal tasks. To enhance their understanding of legal texts and improve reasoning accuracy, a promising approach is to incorporate legal theories. One of the most widely adopted theories is the Four-Element Theory (FET), which defines the crime constitution through four elements: Subject, Object, Subjective Aspect, and Objective Aspect. While recent work has explored prompting LLMs to follow FET, our evaluation demonstrates that LLM-generated four-elements are often incomplete and less representative, limiting their effectiveness in legal reasoning. To address these issues, we present JUREX-4E, an expert-annotated fourelement knowledge base covering 155 criminal charges. The annotations follow a progressive hierarchical framework grounded in legal source validity and incorporate diverse interpretive methods to ensure precision and authority. We evaluate JUREX-4E on the Similar Charge Disambiguation task and apply it to Legal Case Retrieval. Experimental results validate the high quality of JUREX-4E and its substantial impact on downstream legal tasks, underscoring its potential for advancing legal AI applications. The dataset and code are available at: https://github.com/THUlawtech/JUREX
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3b9b25ab-15c3-438d-95b0-820363dedb52Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case RetrievalHaitao Li, Qingyao Ai, Jia Chen, Qian Dong et al.SIGIR 2023 · 68 citations
- LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language ModelsZhiwei Fei, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Fengzhe Zhou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 59 citations
- Syllogistic Reasoning for Legal Judgment AnalysisWentao Deng, Jiahuan Pei, Keyi Kong, Zhe Chen et al.EMNLP 2023 · 17 citations
- Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative ApproachWeicong Qin, Zelin Cao, Weijie Yu, Zihua Si et al.SIGIR 2024 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Through the MUD: A Multi-Defendant Charge Prediction Benchmark with Linked Crime ElementsXiao Wei, Qi Xu, Hang Yu, Qian Liu et al.ACL 2024
- Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case ReformulationChenlong Deng, Kelong Mao, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements GenerationChaeeun Kim, Jinu Lee, Wonseok HwangEMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- CFGL-LCR: A Counterfactual Graph Learning Framework for Legal Case RetrievalKun Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, Qi Tian et al.KDD 2023 · 9 citations
- Automating Legal Interpretation with LLMs: Retrieval, Generation, and EvaluationKangcheng Luo, Quzhe Huang, Cong Jiang, Yansong FengACL 2025 · 4 citations
