On the Predictability of Pruning Across Scales
Jonathan S. Rosenfeld, Jonathan Frankle, Michael Carbin, Nir Shavit
Abstract
We show that the error of iteratively-pruned networks empirically follows a scaling law with interpretable coefficients that depend on the architecture and task. We functionally approximate the error of the pruned networks, showing that it is predictable in terms of an invariant tying width, depth, and pruning level, such that networks of vastly different sparsities are freely interchangeable. We demonstrate the accuracy of this functional approximation over scales spanning orders of magnitude in depth, width, dataset size, and sparsity. We show that the scaling law functional form holds (generalizes) for large scale data (CIFAR-10, ImageNet), architectures (ResNets, VGGs) and iterative pruning algorithms (IMP, SynFlow). As neural networks become ever larger and more expensive to train, our findings suggest a framework for reasoning conceptually and analytically about pruning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c116a56c-314e-40e5-908d-344056b10d97Cited by top-tier papers13
- Scaling Laws for Sparsely-Connected Foundation ModelsElias Frantar, Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Neil Houlsby, Dan Alistarh et al.ICLR 2024 · 48 citations
- Validating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Inertial Manifold TheoryZeru Zhang, Jiayin Jin, Zijie Zhang, Yang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter OptimizationArlind Kadra, Maciej Janowski, Martin Wistuba, Josif GrabockaNeurIPS 2023 · 23 citations
- Reusing Deep Neural Network Models through Model Re-engineeringBinhang Qi, Hailong Sun, Xiang Gao, Hongyu Zhang et al.ICSE 2023 · 16 citations
- Broken Neural Scaling LawsEthan Caballero, Kshitij Gupta, Irina Rish, David KruegerICLR 2023 · 15 citations
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient DeploymentHan Cai, Chuang Gan, Tianzhe Wang, Zhekai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,522 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
Related papers
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Greedy Optimization Provably Wins the Lottery: Logarithmic Number of Winning Tickets is EnoughMao Ye, Lemeng Wu, Qiang LiuNeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- NeuralScale: Efficient Scaling of Neurons for Resource-Constrained Deep Neural NetworksEugene Lee, Chen-Yi LeeCVPR 2020
- A Probabilistic Approach to Neural Network PruningXin Qian, Diego KlabjanICML 2021 · 24 citations
