Graphical Perception of Icon Arrays versus Bar Charts for Value Comparisons in Health Risk Communication
Jade Kandel, Jiayi Liu, Arran Zeyu Wang, Chin Tseng, Danielle Albers Szafir
Abstract
Visualizations support critical decision making in domains like health risk communication. This is particularly important for those at higher health risks and their care providers, allowing for better risk interpretation which may lead to more informed decisions. However, the kinds of visualizations used to represent data may impart biases that influence data interpretation and decision making. Both continuous representations using bar charts and discrete representations using icon arrays are pervasive in health risk communication, but express the same quantities using fundamentally different visual paradigms. We conducted a series of studies to investigate how bar charts, icon arrays, and their layout (juxtaposed, explicit encoding, explicit encoding plus juxtaposition) affect the perception of value comparison and subsequent decision-making in health risk communication. Our results suggest that icon arrays and explicit encoding combined with juxtaposition can optimize for both accurate difference estimation and perceptual biases in decision making. We also found misalignment between estimation accuracy and decision making, as well as between low and high literacy groups, emphasizing the importance of tailoring visualization approaches to specific audiences and evaluating visualizations beyond perceptual accuracy alone. This research contributes empirically-grounded design recommendations to improve comparison in health risk communication and support more informed decision-making across domains.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c112e179-39ad-4adc-b5a9-2d5bf1ed0aa9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Comparative Layouts Revisited: Design Space, Guidelines, and Future DirectionsSehi L'Yi, Jaemin Jo, Jinwook SeoIEEE VIS 2020 · 49 citations
- Who Do We Mean When We Talk About Visualization Novices?Alyxander Burns, Christiana Lee, Ria Chawla, Evan Peck et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- Do You See What I See? A Qualitative Study Eliciting High-Level Visualization ComprehensionGhulam Jilani Quadri, Arran Zeyu Wang, Zhehao Wang, Jennifer Adorno Nieves et al.CHI 2024 · 37 citations
- Investigating Perceptual Biases in Icon ArraysCindy Xiong, Ali Sarvghad, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman et al.CHI 2022 · 35 citations
- VITALITY: Promoting Serendipitous Discovery of Academic Literature with Transformers & Visual AnalyticsArpit Narechania, Alireza Karduni, Ryan Wesslen, Emily WallIEEE VIS 2021 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Why Combining Text and Visualization Could Improve Bayesian Reasoning: A Cognitive Load PerspectiveMelanie Bancilhon, Amanda Wright, Sunwoo Ha, R. Jordan Crouser et al.CHI 2023 · 18 citations
- Visual Arrangements of Bar Charts Influence Comparisons in Viewer TakeawaysCindy Xiong, Vidya Setlur, Benjamin Bach, Eunyee Koh et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 40 citations
- My Model is Unfair, Do People Even Care? Visual Design Affects Trust and Perceived Bias in Machine LearningAimen Gaba, Zhanna Kaufman, Jason Cheung, Marie Shvakel et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 20 citations
- Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and DecisionsAlex Kale, Matthew Kay, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 112 citations
- Semantic Discriminability for Visual CommunicationKaren B. Schloss, Zachary Leggon, Laurent LessardIEEE VIS 2020 · 47 citations
