Investigating Perceptual Biases in Icon Arrays
Cindy Xiong, Ali Sarvghad, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Çagatay Demiralp
Abstract
Icon arrays are graphical displays in which a subset of identical shapes are filled to convey probabilities. They are widely used for communicating probabilities to the general public. A primary design decision concerning icon arrays is how to fill and arrange these shapes. For example, a designer could fill the shapes from top to bottom or in a random fashion. We investigated the effect of different arrangements in icon arrays on probability perception. We showed participants icon arrays depicting probabilities between 0% and 100% in six different arrangements. Participants were more accurate in estimating probabilities when viewing the top, row, and diagonal arrangements, but they overestimated the proportions with the central arrangement and underestimated the proportions with the edge arrangement. They were biased to either overestimate or underestimate when viewing the random arrangement depending on the objective proportions, following a cyclical pattern consistent with existing findings in the psychophysics literature.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1af91bc0-95ad-49e9-8752-aaec833ff46aCited by top-tier papers12
- Seeing What You Believe or Believing What You See? Belief Biases Correlation EstimationCindy Xiong, Chase Stokes, Yea-Seul Kim, Steven FranconeriIEEE VIS 2022 · 49 citations
- Who Do We Mean When We Talk About Visualization Novices?Alyxander Burns, Christiana Lee, Ria Chawla, Evan Peck et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. MidtermsFumeng Yang, Mandi Cai, Chloe Mortenson, Hoda Fakhari et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 30 citations
- Dispersion vs Disparity: Hiding Variability Can Encourage Stereotyping When Visualizing Social OutcomesEli Holder, Cindy XiongIEEE VIS 2022 · 22 citations
- My Model is Unfair, Do People Even Care? Visual Design Affects Trust and Perceived Bias in Machine LearningAimen Gaba, Zhanna Kaufman, Jason Cheung, Marie Shvakel et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 20 citations
Builds on3
- A Design Space of Vision Science Methods for Visualization ResearchMadison A. Elliott, Christine Nothelfer, Cindy Xiong, Danielle Albers SzafirIEEE VIS 2020 · 48 citations
- A Probabilistic Grammar of GraphicsXiaoying Pu, Matthew KayCHI 2020 · 31 citations
- No mark is an island: Precision and category repulsion biases in data reproductionsCaitlyn M. McColeman, Lane Harrison, Mi Feng, Steven FranconeriIEEE VIS 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Graphical Perception of Icon Arrays versus Bar Charts for Value Comparisons in Health Risk CommunicationJade Kandel, Jiayi Liu, Arran Zeyu Wang, Chin Tseng et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 3 citations
- ? A Cross-Language Study of How People Verbalize Probabilities in Icon Array VisualizationsNoëlle Rakotondravony, Yiren Ding, Lane HarrisonIEEE VIS 2022 · 5 citations
- Why Combining Text and Visualization Could Improve Bayesian Reasoning: A Cognitive Load PerspectiveMelanie Bancilhon, Amanda Wright, Sunwoo Ha, R. Jordan Crouser et al.CHI 2023 · 18 citations
- Truth or Square: Aspect Ratio Biases Recall of Position EncodingsCristina R. Ceja, Caitlyn M. McColeman, Cindy Xiong, Steven L. FranconeriIEEE VIS 2020 · 20 citations
- Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and DecisionsAlex Kale, Matthew Kay, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 112 citations
