A Design Space of Vision Science Methods for Visualization Research
Madison A. Elliott, Christine Nothelfer, Cindy Xiong, Danielle Albers Szafir
Abstract
A growing number of efforts aim to understand what people see when using a visualization. These efforts provide scientific grounding to complement design intuitions, leading to more effective visualization practice. However, published visualization research currently reflects a limited set of available methods for understanding how people process visualized data. Alternative methods from vision science offer a rich suite of tools for understanding visualizations, but no curated collection of these methods exists in either perception or visualization research. We introduce a design space of experimental methods for empirically investigating the perceptual processes involved with viewing data visualizations to ultimately inform visualization design guidelines. This paper provides a shared lexicon for facilitating experimental visualization research. We discuss popular experimental paradigms, adjustment types, response types, and dependent measures used in vision science research, rooting each in visualization examples. We then discuss the advantages and limitations of each technique. Researchers can use this design space to create innovative studies and progress scientific understanding of design choices and evaluations in visualization. We highlight a history of collaborative success between visualization and vision science research and advocate for a deeper relationship between the two fields that can elaborate on and extend the methodological design space for understanding visualization and vision.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers13
- Do You See What I See? A Qualitative Study Eliciting High-Level Visualization ComprehensionGhulam Jilani Quadri, Arran Zeyu Wang, Zhehao Wang, Jennifer Adorno Nieves et al.CHI 2024 · 37 citations
- Investigating Perceptual Biases in Icon ArraysCindy Xiong, Ali Sarvghad, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman et al.CHI 2022 · 35 citations
- Reconfiguration Strategies with Composite Data PhysicalizationsKim Sauvé, David Verweij, Jason Alexander, Steven HoubenCHI 2021 · 22 citations
- Evaluating the Use of Uncertainty Visualisations for Imputations of Data Missing At Random in ScatterplotsAbhraneel Sarma, Shunan Guo, Jane Hoffswell, Ryan A. Rossi et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 19 citations
- Confirmation Bias: The Double-Edged Sword of Data Facts in Visual Data CommunicationShiyao Li, Thomas James Davidson, Cindy Xiong Bearfield, Emily WallCHI 2025 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Data Visualization Design PracticePaul ParsonsIEEE VIS 2021 · 53 citations
- Beyond Problem Solving: Framing and Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in Data Visualization DesignPaul C. Parsons, Prakash Chandra ShuklaIEEE VIS 2025 · 5 citations
- Who Do We Mean When We Talk About Visualization Novices?Alyxander Burns, Christiana Lee, Ria Chawla, Evan Peck et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- Comparison Conundrum and the Chamber of Visualizations: An Exploration of How Language Influences Visual DesignAimen Gaba, Vidya Setlur, Arjun Srinivasan, Jane Hoffswell et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 16 citations
- How Visualization Designers Perceive and Use InspirationAli Baigelenov, Prakash Shukla, Paul ParsonsCHI 2025 · 6 citations
