Metacognitive Demands and Strategies While Using Off-The-Shelf AI Conversational Agents for Health Information Seeking
Shri Harini Ramesh, Foroozan Daneshzand, Babak Rashidi, Shriti Raj, Hariharan Subramonyam, Fateme Rajabiyazdi
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) conversational agents become widespread, people are increasingly using them for health information seeking. The use of off-the-shelf conversational agents for health information seeking could place high metacognitive demands (the need for extensive monitoring and control of one's own thought process) on individuals, which could compromise their experience of seeking health information. However, currently, the specific demands that arise while using conversational agents for health information seeking, and the strategies people use to cope with those demands, remain unknown. To address these gaps, we conducted a think-aloud study with 15 participants as they sought health information using our off-the-shelf AI conversational agent. We identified the metacognitive demands such systems impose, the strategies people adopt in response, and propose considerations for designing beyond off-the-shelf interfaces to reduce these demands and support better user experiences and affordances in health information seeking.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext de93d21c-4bb9-45a6-a7a7-988c104c2160Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model PromptsTongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, Carrie Jun CaiCHI 2022 · 465 citations
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2024 · 279 citations
Related papers
- Towards Better Health Conversations: The Benefits of Context-seekingRory Sayres, Yuexing Hao, Abbi Ward, Amy Wang et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Privacy and Safety Experiences and Concerns of US Women Using Generative AI for Seeking Sexual and Reproductive Health InformationIna Kaleva, Xiao Zhan, Ruba Abu-Salma, Jose SuchCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- T2 Coach: A Qualitative Study of an Automated Health Coach for Diabetes Self-ManagementElliot G. Mitchell, Pooja M. Desai, Arlene M. Smaldone, Andrea Cassells et al.CHI 2025 · 10 citations
- Words to Describe What I'm Feeling: Exploring the Potential of AI Agents for High Subjectivity Decisions in Advance Care PlanningKellie Yu Hui Sim, Pin Sym Foong, Chenyu Zhao, Melanie Yi Ning Quek et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- CASEbot: A Conversational Agent for Structuring and Personalizing the Design of Self-Experiments in Personal HealthSabrina Zaman Ishita, Sidharth Kaliappan, Mashrur Rashik, Daniel A. Epstein et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
