A New World in the Depths of Microcrypt: Separating OWSGs and Quantum Money from QEFID
Amit Behera, Giulio Malavolta, Tomoyuki Morimae, Tamer Mour, Takashi Yamakawa
Abstract
While in classical cryptography one-way functions (OWFs) are widely regarded as the "minimal assumption", the situation in quantum cryptography is less clear. Recent works have put forward two concurrent candidates for the minimal assumption in quantum cryptography: One-way state generators (OWSGs), postulating the existence of a hard search problem with an efficient verification algorithm, and EFI pairs, postulating the existence of a hard distinguishing problem. Two recent papers [Khurana and Tomer STOC'24; Batra and Jain FOCS'24] showed that OWSGs imply EFI pairs, but the reverse direction remained open.
In this work, we give strong evidence that the opposite direction does not hold: We show that there is a quantum unitary oracle relative to which EFI pairs exist but OWSGs do not. In fact, we show a slightly stronger statement that holds also for EFI pairs that output classical bits (QEFID pairs).
As a consequence, we separate, via our oracle, QEFID pairs and one-way puzzles from OWSGs and several other Microcrypt primitives, including efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles and unclonable state generators. In particular, this solves a problem left open in [Chung, Goldin, and Gray Crypto'24].
Using similar techniques, we also establish a fully black-box separation (which is slightly weaker than an oracle separation) between private-key quantum money schemes and QEFID pairs.
One conceptual implication of our work is that the existence of an efficient verification algorithm may lead to qualitatively stronger primitives in quantum cryptography.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c0145890-fdfd-4c4c-a094-b9a515fbf614Cited by top-tier papers6
- Separating QMA from QCMA with a Classical OracleJohn Bostanci, Jonas Haferkamp, Chinmay Nirkhe, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2026 · 10 citations
- The Power of a Single Haar Random State: Constructing and Separating Quantum PseudorandomnessBoyang Chen, Andrea Coladangelo, Or SattathEUROCRYPT 2025 · 6 citations
- A Meta-complexity Characterization of Minimal Quantum CryptographyBruno Cavalar, Boyang Chen, Andrea Coladangelo, Matthew Gray et al.STOC 2026 · 4 citations
- Oracle Separation Between Quantum Commitments and Quantum One-WaynessJohn Bostanci, Boyang Chen, Barak NehoranEUROCRYPT 2025 · 3 citations
- Pseudorandom Unitaries in the Haar Random Oracle ModelPrabhanjan Ananth, John Bostanci, Aditya Gulati, Yao-Ting LinCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on8
- Cryptography from Pseudorandom Quantum StatesPrabhanjan Ananth, Luowen Qian, Henry YuenCRYPTO 2022 · 78 citations
- Quantum Commitments and Signatures Without One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2022 · 74 citations
- Quantum Cryptography in AlgorithmicaWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Makrand Sinha, Avishay TalSTOC 2023 · 47 citations
- Commitments from Quantum One-WaynessDakshita Khurana, Kabir TomerSTOC 2024 · 21 citations
- A One-Query Lower Bound for Unitary Synthesis and Breaking Quantum CryptographyAlex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, John WrightSTOC 2024 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Quantum Cryptography and Meta-ComplexityTaiga Hiroka, Tomoyuki MorimaeCRYPTO 2025 · 3 citations
- On Central Primitives for Quantum Cryptography with Classical CommunicationKai-Min Chung, Eli Goldin, Matthew GrayCRYPTO 2024 · 11 citations
- On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing MeasurementsAlper Çakan, Dakshita Khurana, Tomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa et al.EUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
- Cryptographic Characterization of Quantum AdvantageTomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa, Takashi YamakawaSTOC 2025
- On Quantum Money and Evasive ObfuscationMark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2025 · 2 citations
