Quantum Cryptography and Meta-Complexity
Taiga Hiroka, Tomoyuki Morimae
Abstract
In classical cryptography, one-way functions (OWFs) are the minimal assumption, while it is not the case in quantum cryptography. Several new primitives have been introduced such as pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs), pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs), pseudorandom state generators (PRSGs), one-way state generators (OWSGs), one-way puzzles (OWPuzzs), and EFI pairs. They seem to be weaker than OWFs, but still imply many useful applications such as private-key quantum money schemes, secret-key encryption, message authentication codes, digital signatures, commitments, and multiparty computations. Now that the possibility of quantum cryptography without OWFs has opened up, the most important goal in the field is to build a foundation of it. In this paper, we, for the first time, characterize quantum cryptographic primitives with meta-complexity. We show that one-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) exist if and only if GapK is weakly-quantum-average-hard. GapK is a promise problem to decide whether a given bit string has a small Kolmogorov complexity or not. Weakly-quantum-averagehard means that an instance is sampled from a QPT samplable distribution, and for any QPT adversary the probability that it makes mistake is larger than 1/poly. We also show that if quantum PRGs exist then GapK is strongly-quantum-average-hard. Here, strongly-quantum-average-hard is a stronger version of weakly-quantum-average-hard where the probability that the adversary makes mistake is larger than 1/2 -1/poly. Finally, we show that if GapK is weakly-classical-average-hard, then inefficient-verifier proofs of quantumness (IV-PoQ) exist. Weakly-classical-average-hard is the same as weakly-quantumaverage-hard except that the adversary is PPT. IV-PoQ are a generalization of proofs of quantumness (PoQ) that capture sampling-based and search-based quantum advantage, and an important application of OWpuzzs. This is the fist time that quantum advantage is based on meta-complexity. (Note: There are two concurrent works, [KT24b,CGGH24].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ae4e0718-bdd9-43b3-992c-10c44d952b6fCited by top-tier papers2
- A Meta-complexity Characterization of Minimal Quantum CryptographyBruno Cavalar, Boyang Chen, Andrea Coladangelo, Matthew Gray et al.STOC 2026 · 4 citations
- Post-quantum Cryptography from Quantum Stabilizer DecodingJonathan Z. Lu, Alexander Poremba, Yihui Quek, Akshar RamkumarCRYPTO 2026
Builds on17
- Cryptography from Pseudorandom Quantum StatesPrabhanjan Ananth, Luowen Qian, Henry YuenCRYPTO 2022 · 78 citations
- Quantum Commitments and Signatures Without One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2022 · 74 citations
- One-Way Functions Imply Secure Computation in a Quantum WorldJames Bartusek, Andrea Coladangelo, Dakshita Khurana, Fermi MaCRYPTO 2021 · 57 citations
- Oblivious Transfer Is in MiniQCryptAlex B. Grilo, Huijia Lin, Fang Song, Vinod VaikuntanathanEUROCRYPT 2021 · 56 citations
- Quantum Cryptography in AlgorithmicaWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Makrand Sinha, Avishay TalSTOC 2023 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Cryptographic Characterization of Quantum AdvantageTomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa, Takashi YamakawaSTOC 2025
- A Meta-complexity Characterization of Quantum CryptographyBruno Pasqualotto Cavalar, Eli Goldin, Matthew Gray, Peter HallEUROCRYPT 2025 · 2 citations
- A New World in the Depths of Microcrypt: Separating OWSGs and Quantum Money from QEFIDAmit Behera, Giulio Malavolta, Tomoyuki Morimae, Tamer Mour et al.EUROCRYPT 2025 · 3 citations
- Quantum Advantage from One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2024 · 4 citations
- Commitments from Quantum One-WaynessDakshita Khurana, Kabir TomerSTOC 2024 · 21 citations
