Commitments from Quantum One-Wayness
Dakshita Khurana, Kabir Tomer
Abstract
One-way functions are central to classical cryptography. They are necessary for the existence of non-trivial classical cryptosystems, and also sufficient to realize meaningful primitives including commitments, pseudorandom generators and digital signatures. At the same time, a mounting body of evidence suggests that assumptions even weaker than one-way functions may suffice for many cryptographic tasks of interest in a quantum world, including bit commitments and secure multi-party computation.
This work studies one-way state generators [Morimae-Yamakawa, CRYPTO 2022], a natural quantum relaxation of one-way functions. Given a secret key, a one-way state generator outputs a hard to invert quantum state. A fundamental question is whether this type of quantum one-wayness suffices to realize quantum cryptography. We obtain an affirmative answer to this question, by proving that one-way state generators with pure state outputs imply quantum bit commitments and secure multiparty computation.
Along the way, we use efficient shadow tomography [Huang et. al., Nature Physics 2020] to build an intermediate primitive with classical outputs, which we call a (quantum) one-way puzzle. Our main technical contribution is a proof that one-way puzzles imply quantum bit commitments. This proof develops new techniques for pseudoentropy generation [Hastad et. al., SICOMP 1999] from arbitrary distributions, which may be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0c995408-00c9-44d5-b0e4-c8016ea1d348Cited by top-tier papers15
- On Central Primitives for Quantum Cryptography with Classical CommunicationKai-Min Chung, Eli Goldin, Matthew GrayCRYPTO 2024 · 11 citations
- Unconditionally Secure Commitments with Quantum Auxiliary InputsTomoyuki Morimae, Barak Nehoran, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2024 · 7 citations
- Commitments are Equivalent to Statistically-Verifiable One-Way State GeneratorsRishabh Batra, Rahul JainFOCS 2024 · 7 citations
- The Power of a Single Haar Random State: Constructing and Separating Quantum PseudorandomnessBoyang Chen, Andrea Coladangelo, Or SattathEUROCRYPT 2025 · 6 citations
- Pseudorandomness in the (Inverseless) Haar Random Oracle ModelPrabhanjan Ananth, John Bostanci, Aditya Gulati, Yao-Ting LinEUROCRYPT 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on5
- Cryptography from Pseudorandom Quantum StatesPrabhanjan Ananth, Luowen Qian, Henry YuenCRYPTO 2022 · 78 citations
- Oblivious Transfer Is in MiniQCryptAlex B. Grilo, Huijia Lin, Fang Song, Vinod VaikuntanathanEUROCRYPT 2021 · 56 citations
- On the Impossibility of Key Agreements from Quantum Random OraclesPer Austrin, Hao Chung, Kai-Min Chung, Shiuan Fu et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 20 citations
- Commitments to Quantum StatesSam Gunn, Nathan Ju, Fermi Ma, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2023 · 16 citations
- A One-Query Lower Bound for Unitary Synthesis and Breaking Quantum CryptographyAlex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, John WrightSTOC 2024 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Oracle Separation Between Quantum Commitments and Quantum One-WaynessJohn Bostanci, Boyang Chen, Barak NehoranEUROCRYPT 2025 · 3 citations
- Quantum Commitments and Signatures Without One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2022 · 74 citations
- Hard Quantum Extrapolations in Quantum CryptographyLuowen Qian, Justin Raizes, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2025 · 1 citation
- Founding Quantum Cryptography on Quantum Advantage, or, Towards Cryptography from #P HardnessDakshita Khurana, Kabir TomerSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Quantum Cryptography and Meta-ComplexityTaiga Hiroka, Tomoyuki MorimaeCRYPTO 2025 · 3 citations
