Fairness Shields: Safeguarding against Biased Decision Makers
Filip Cano, Thomas A. Henzinger, Bettina Könighofer, Konstantin Kueffner, Kaushik Mallik
Abstract
As AI-based decision-makers increasingly influence human lives, it is a growing concern that their decisions are often unfair or biased with respect to people's sensitive attributes, such as gender and race. Most existing bias prevention measures provide probabilistic fairness guarantees in the long run, and it is possible that the decisions are biased on specific instances of short decision sequences. We introduce fairness shielding, where a symbolic decision-maker-the fairness shield-continuously monitors the sequence of decisions of another deployed black-box decision-maker, and makes interventions so that a given fairness criterion is met while the total intervention costs are minimized. We present four different algorithms for computing fairness shields, among which one guarantees fairness over fixed horizons, and three guarantee fairness periodically after fixed intervals. Given a distribution over future decisions and their intervention costs, our algorithms solve different instances of bounded-horizon optimal control problems with different levels of computational costs and optimality guarantees. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of these shields in ensuring fairness while maintaining cost efficiency across various scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bfed39ca-02df-4aff-ab6a-112df656a4ffCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness MethodsXiaotian Han, Jianfeng Chi, Yu Chen, Qifan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 48 citations
- Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify FairnessBishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota Basu, Kuldeep S. MeelAAAI 2021 · 46 citations
- Certifying Robustness to Programmable Data Bias in Decision TreesAnna P. Meyer, Aws Albarghouthi, Loris D'AntoniNeurIPS 2021 · 34 citations
- Achieving Long-Term Fairness in Sequential Decision MakingYaowei Hu, Lu ZhangAAAI 2022 · 29 citations
- Probabilistic Verification of Neural Networks Against Group FairnessBing Sun, Jun Sun, Ting Dai, Lijun ZhangFM 2021 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Causal Fairness for Outcome ControlDrago Plecko, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- On Testing for Discrimination Using Causal ModelsHana Chockler, Joseph Y. HalpernAAAI 2022 · 5 citations
- Monitoring Algorithmic FairnessThomas A. Henzinger, Mahyar Karimi, Konstantin Kueffner, Kaushik MallikCAV 2023 · 13 citations
- Fairness-aware Adversarial Perturbation Towards Bias Mitigation for Deployed Deep ModelsZhibo Wang, Xiaowei Dong, Henry Xue, Zhifei Zhang et al.CVPR 2022 · 49 citations
- Online Fairness Auditing through Iterative RefinementPranav Maneriker, Codi Burley, Srinivasan ParthasarathyKDD 2023 · 6 citations
