On Testing for Discrimination Using Causal Models
Hana Chockler, Joseph Y. Halpern
Abstract
Consider a bank that uses an AI system to decide which loan applications to approve. We want to ensure that the system is fair, that is, it does not discriminate against applicants based on a predefined list of sensitive attributes, such as gender and ethnicity. We expect there to be a regulator whose job it is to certify the bank’s system as fair or unfair. We consider issues that the regulator will have to confront when making such a decision, including the precise definition of fairness, dealing with proxy variables, and dealing with what we call allowed variables, that is, variables such as salary on which the decision is allowed to depend, despite being correlated with sensitive variables. We show (among other things) that the problem of deciding fairness as we have defined it is co-NP-complete, but then argue that, despite that, in practice the problem should be manageable.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 14fd2002-ce90-429e-b9a7-29f8eb4982e7Related papers
- Monitoring Algorithmic FairnessThomas A. Henzinger, Mahyar Karimi, Konstantin Kueffner, Kaushik MallikCAV 2023 · 13 citations
- Causal Fairness for Outcome ControlDrago Plecko, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Fairness Shields: Safeguarding against Biased Decision MakersFilip Cano, Thomas A. Henzinger, Bettina Könighofer, Konstantin Kueffner et al.AAAI 2025
- Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination PatternsYooJung Choi, Golnoosh Farnadi, Behrouz Babaki, Guy Van den BroeckAAAI 2020 · 31 citations
- Empirical Likelihood for Fair ClassificationPangpang Liu, Yichuan ZhaoICLR 2024 · 1 citation
