Provably Efficient Learning of Transferable Rewards
Alberto Maria Metelli, Giorgia Ramponi, Alessandro Concetti, Marcello Restelli
Abstract
The reward function is widely accepted as a succinct, robust, and transferable representation of a task. Typical approaches, at the basis of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), leverage expert demonstrations to recover a reward function. In this paper, we study the theoretical properties of the class of reward functions that are compatible with the expert's behavior. We analyze how the limited knowledge of the expert's policy and of the environment affects the reward reconstruction phase. Then, we examine how the error propagates to the learned policy's performance when transferring the reward function to a different environment. We employ these findings to devise a provably efficient active sampling approach, aware of the need for transferring the reward function, that can be paired with a large variety of IRL algorithms. Finally, we provide numerical simulations on benchmark environments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext befdcdf3-3873-4e95-ac5f-f38b98234de0Cited by top-tier papers22
- Active Exploration for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDavid Lindner, Andreas Krause, Giorgia RamponiNeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement LearningPaul Rolland, Luca Viano, Norman Schürhoff, Boris Nikolov et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement LearningAlberto Maria Metelli, Filippo Lazzati, Marcello RestelliICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Uncertainty-aware Constraint Inference in Inverse Constrained Reinforcement LearningSheng Xu, Guiliang LiuICLR 2024 · 12 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal GuaranteesGregory Dexter, Kevin Bello, Jean HonorioNeurIPS 2021 · 9 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Environment Design for Inverse Reinforcement LearningThomas Kleine Buening, Victor Villin, Christos DimitrakakisICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Balancing Sample Efficiency and Suboptimality in Inverse Reinforcement LearningAngelo Damiani, Giorgio Manganini, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello RestelliICML 2022 · 4 citations
- Sub-optimal Experts mitigate Ambiguity in Inverse Reinforcement LearningRiccardo Poiani, Gabriele Curti, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient AlgorithmsFilippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2024 · 8 citations
