Balancing Sample Efficiency and Suboptimality in Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Angelo Damiani, Giorgio Manganini, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello Restelli
Abstract
We propose a novel formulation for the Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) problem, which jointly accounts for the compatibility with the expert behavior of the identified reward and its effectiveness for the subsequent forward learning phase. Albeit quite natural, especially when the final goal is apprenticeship learning (learning policies from an expert), this aspect has been completely overlooked by IRL approaches so far. We propose a new model-free IRL method that is remarkably able to autonomously find a trade-off between the error induced on the learned policy when potentially choosing a sub-optimal reward, and the estimation error caused by using finite samples in the forward learning phase, which can be controlled by explicitly optimizing also the discount factor of the related learning problem. The approach is based on a min-max formulation for the robust selection of the reward parameters and the discount factor so that the distance between the expert’s policy and the learned policy is minimized in the successive forward learning task when a finite and possibly small number of samples is available. Differently from the majority of other IRL techniques, our approach does not involve any planning or forward Reinforcement Learning problems to be solved. After presenting the formulation, we provide a numerical scheme for the optimization, and we show its effectiveness on an illustrative numerical case.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ac4bb90b-c1e2-4908-be48-a7122f92427eCited by top-tier papers2
- No-Regret Reinforcement Learning in Smooth MDPsDavide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Marcello RestelliICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Local Linearity: the Key for No-regret Reinforcement Learning in Continuous MDPsDavide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Provably Efficient Learning of Transferable RewardsAlberto Maria Metelli, Giorgia Ramponi, Alessandro Concetti, Marcello RestelliICML 2021 · 36 citations
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning with the Average Reward CriterionFeiyang Wu, Jingyang Ke, Anqi WuNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement LearningAlberto Maria Metelli, Filippo Lazzati, Marcello RestelliICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal GuaranteesGregory Dexter, Kevin Bello, Jean HonorioNeurIPS 2021 · 9 citations
